PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MJFOX vs. HJPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MJFOX vs. HJPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) and Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJFOX achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than HJPSX's 13.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MJFOX has underperformed HJPSX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while HJPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.47% annualized return.


MJFOX

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.70%
YTD
16.96%
6M
18.02%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
23.06%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
9.08%

HJPSX

1D
-0.81%
1M
4.23%
YTD
13.82%
6M
18.30%
1Y
30.69%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJFOX vs. HJPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
16.96%22.72%16.31%25.79%-27.84%-5.79%29.80%26.08%-20.12%33.22%
HJPSX
Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
13.82%29.02%8.24%16.30%-16.35%-4.64%13.43%19.97%-12.56%49.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MJFOX and HJPSX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.78

The correlation between MJFOX and HJPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MJFOX vs. HJPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJFOX
MJFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MJFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MJFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MJFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MJFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MJFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

HJPSX
HJPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
HJPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HJPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
HJPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
HJPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
HJPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJFOX vs. HJPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) and Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MJFOXHJPSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.27

1.68

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

2.33

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.97

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.82

6.09

+0.73

MJFOX vs. HJPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MJFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the HJPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJFOX and HJPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MJFOXHJPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

1.68

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.50

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.59

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.51

-0.15

Drawdowns

MJFOX vs. HJPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJFOX drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than HJPSX's maximum drawdown of -47.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJFOX and HJPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MJFOXHJPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.52%

-47.91%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-14.77%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.14%

-14.77%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.85%

-33.24%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.85%

-34.80%

-8.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-3.74%

+3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.26%

-10.06%

-11.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

4.79%

-0.75%

Volatility

MJFOX vs. HJPSX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) at 4.07%. This indicates that MJFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HJPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MJFOXHJPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

4.07%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.20%

13.33%

+3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.89%

17.39%

+4.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

17.24%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

17.74%

+1.11%

MJFOX vs. HJPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJFOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HJPSX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MJFOX vs. HJPSX - Dividend Comparison

MJFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than HJPSX's 11.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HJPSX
Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
11.64%13.25%3.64%0.85%0.61%0.43%0.23%1.30%3.46%2.09%2.03%3.34%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
1.67%1.96%2.12%6.09%7.19%8.08%10.15%8.63%4.14%3.90%1.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MJFOX and HJPSX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MJFOX has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to HJPSX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MJFOX dropped -63.52% vs HJPSX's -47.91%.

HJPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MJFOX and HJPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer