PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HJPSX vs. FIQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HJPSX vs. FIQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HJPSX achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly lower than FIQLX's 24.66% return.


HJPSX

1D
-1.11%
1M
4.93%
YTD
14.74%
6M
18.70%
1Y
30.07%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
10.56%

FIQLX

1D
-0.08%
1M
7.48%
YTD
24.66%
6M
25.53%
1Y
42.94%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HJPSX vs. FIQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HJPSX
Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
14.74%29.02%8.24%16.30%-16.35%-4.64%13.43%19.97%-10.99%
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
24.66%31.84%7.43%16.09%-22.16%3.32%25.58%25.93%-11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HJPSX and FIQLX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.85

The correlation between HJPSX and FIQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HJPSX vs. FIQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HJPSX
HJPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
HJPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HJPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HJPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HJPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HJPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQLX
FIQLX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FIQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HJPSX vs. FIQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HJPSXFIQLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

2.16

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.53

2.91

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.64

-1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.90

13.91

-7.01

HJPSX vs. FIQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HJPSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FIQLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HJPSX and FIQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HJPSXFIQLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.16

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.53

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Drawdowns

HJPSX vs. FIQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HJPSX drawdown since its inception was -47.91%, which is greater than FIQLX's maximum drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HJPSX and FIQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HJPSXFIQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-36.13%

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-12.73%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-19.14%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.24%

-36.13%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

-1.52%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-10.30%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.78%

3.33%

+1.45%

Volatility

HJPSX vs. FIQLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund (HJPSX) is 4.02%, while Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that HJPSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HJPSXFIQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

5.32%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

16.35%

-3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.40%

21.23%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.24%

19.96%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.74%

19.86%

-2.12%

HJPSX vs. FIQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HJPSX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQLX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

HJPSX vs. FIQLX - Dividend Comparison

HJPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than FIQLX's 8.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
8.05%10.04%5.04%3.88%0.00%11.89%1.97%1.35%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HJPSX
Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
11.54%13.25%3.64%0.85%0.61%0.43%0.23%1.30%3.46%2.09%2.03%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


HJPSX and FIQLX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQLX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to HJPSX (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HJPSX dropped -47.91% vs FIQLX's -36.13%.

FIQLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HJPSX and FIQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer