MJ vs. ETHU
MJ (ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF) and ETHU (Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MJ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Prime Alternative Harvest Index, while ETHU is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. MJ is passively managed, while ETHU is actively managed. Over the past year, MJ returned 45.02% vs -78.15% for ETHU. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MJ charges 0.75%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for ETHU.
Performance
MJ vs. ETHU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MJ achieves a -19.27% return, which is significantly higher than ETHU's -78.81% return.
MJ
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- -19.27%
- 6M
- -22.79%
- 1Y
- 45.02%
- 3Y*
- -8.85%
- 5Y*
- -35.95%
- 10Y*
- —
ETHU
- 1D
- -9.57%
- 1M
- -44.33%
- YTD
- -78.81%
- 6M
- -78.43%
- 1Y
- -78.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MJ vs. ETHU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | -19.27% | 13.07% | -34.24% |
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | -78.81% | -64.38% | -48.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MJ and ETHU is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MJ vs. ETHU — Risk / Return Rank
MJ
ETHU
MJ vs. ETHU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MJ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.94 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | -0.83 | +1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | -1.19 | +2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MJ vs. ETHU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MJ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, roughly equal to the maximum ETHU drawdown of -96.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJ and ETHU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MJ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.55% | -96.33% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.66% | -93.77% | +45.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.79% | -96.33% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.35% | -69.98% | +0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.42% | 65.78% | -37.36% |
Volatility
MJ vs. ETHU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) is 12.02%, while Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) has a volatility of 40.14%. This indicates that MJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MJ | ETHU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 40.14% | -28.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.09% | 94.86% | -54.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.90% | 139.00% | -52.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.95% | 143.30% | -83.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.64% | 143.30% | -87.66% |
MJ vs. ETHU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHU's 2.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
MJ vs. ETHU - Dividend Comparison
MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than ETHU's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | 6.92% | 2.31% | 0.41% |
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | 2.46% | 1.98% | 13.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MJ and ETHU have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHU has higher volatility (40.14%) compared to MJ (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MJ dropped -96.55% vs ETHU's -96.33%.
On 1-year performance, MJ leads with 45.02% vs -78.15% for ETHU. On fees, MJ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MJ has been the lower-risk option at 12.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MJ has performed better with a 45.02% return vs -78.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MJ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.67% for ETHU.
ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 2.46% for MJ.
MJ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ETHU is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MJ and 2.67% for ETHU.
MJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MJ and ETHU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer