MJ vs. AIEQ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MJ (ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF) and AIEQ (Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MJ is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Prime Alternative Harvest Index, while AIEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the AI Powered Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MJ returned 45.02% vs 17.49% for AIEQ. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

MJ vs. AIEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJ achieves a -19.27% return, which is significantly lower than AIEQ's 7.87% return.

MJ

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: -19.27%
• 6M: -22.79%
• 1Y: 45.02%
• 3Y*: -8.85%
• 5Y*: -35.95%
• 10Y*: —

AIEQ

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 6.55%
• 1Y: 17.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJ vs. AIEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF	-19.27%	13.07%	-31.79%
AIEQ Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF	7.87%	13.96%	15.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MJ and AIEQ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2024	0.37

MJ vs. AIEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MJ	AIEQ
Healthcare	76.4%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	18.9%	4.6%
Real Estate	2.8%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	9.7%
Technology	0.6%	39.7%
Financial Services	0.3%	11.7%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%
Communication Services	-	11.2%
Energy	-	2.8%
Industrials	-	10.4%
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

MJ vs. AIEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJ

MJ Risk / Return Rank: 23
MJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
MJ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MJ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

AIEQ

AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 43
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJ vs. AIEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MJ	AIEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	1.37	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	1.92	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.25	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	1.93	-1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.59	7.29	-5.70

MJ vs. AIEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the AIEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJ and AIEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MJ vs. AIEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, which is greater than AIEQ's maximum drawdown of -24.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJ and AIEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MJ	AIEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.55%	-24.19%	-72.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.66%	-9.11%	-39.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.79%	-3.00%	-91.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.35%	-3.28%	-66.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.42%	2.41%	+26.01%

Volatility

MJ vs. AIEQ - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) at 4.63%. This indicates that MJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MJ	AIEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.02%	4.63%	+7.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.09%	10.12%	+29.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	86.90%	12.85%	+74.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.95%	19.45%	+40.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.64%	19.45%	+36.19%

MJ vs. AIEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MJ and AIEQ have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

MJ vs. AIEQ - Dividend Comparison

MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than AIEQ's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AIEQ Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF	0.40%	0.43%	0.65%
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF	2.46%	1.98%	13.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MJ and AIEQ in my portfolio?

MJ and AIEQ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MJ or AIEQ?

MJ has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to AIEQ (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MJ dropped -96.55% vs AIEQ's -24.19%.

Which ETF is better, MJ or AIEQ?

On 1-year performance, MJ leads with 45.02% vs 17.49% for AIEQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, AIEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MJ or AIEQ?

Over the 1-year period, MJ has performed better with a 45.02% return vs 17.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MJ or AIEQ?

MJ and AIEQ have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MJ or AIEQ?

MJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.40% for AIEQ.

What is the main difference between MJ and AIEQ?

MJ is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AIEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. MJ tracks Prime Alternative Harvest Index, while AIEQ tracks AI Powered Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Amplify.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.