MIVO.L vs. CMU.L
MIVO.L (Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - MIVO.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MIVO.L returned 7.53%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIVO.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.
Performance
MIVO.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIVO.L achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, MIVO.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 7.53%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.
MIVO.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- 4.24%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 10.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
MIVO.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIVO.L Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS | 4.24% | 17.54% | 6.50% | 8.50% | -7.95% | 13.43% | 1.38% | 16.36% | -3.04% | 13.15% |
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.89% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 19.05% | -11.56% | 17.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIVO.L and CMU.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2011 | 0.78 |
The correlation between MIVO.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.81 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MIVO.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Industrials
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Consumer Defensive
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Healthcare
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Utilities
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Energy
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Communication Services
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Basic Materials
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Consumer Cyclical
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Technology
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Real Estate
MIVO.L
CMU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIVO.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank
MIVO.L
CMU.L
MIVO.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIVO.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 2.58 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | 9.67 | -6.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIVO.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.98 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.66 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.65 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.49 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
MIVO.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIVO.L drawdown since its inception was -24.30%, smaller than the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIVO.L and CMU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIVO.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -32.53% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -11.43% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.38% | -11.95% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.54% | -21.11% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.30% | -31.41% | +7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -0.18% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -5.80% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.05% | -0.21% |
Volatility
MIVO.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) is 2.77%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that MIVO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIVO.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 5.34% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 12.44% | -5.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.91% | 14.86% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 16.00% | -5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 16.78% | -4.53% |
MIVO.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIVO.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MIVO.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MIVO.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MIVO.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIVO.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIVO.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.
MIVO.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for MIVO.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.
Find the right allocation for MIVO.L and CMU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer