MIVO.L vs. CSWG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L).
MIVO.L and CSWG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MIVO.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. CSWG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Switzerland NR CHF. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. Both MIVO.L and CSWG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MIVO.L vs. CSWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIVO.L vs. CSWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIVO.L Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS | 4.90% | 17.54% | 6.50% | 8.50% | -7.95% | 13.43% | 1.38% | 16.36% | -3.04% | 13.15% |
CSWG.L Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF | -0.01% | 23.70% | -0.86% | 8.57% | -7.50% | 19.38% | 6.91% | 29.09% | -2.83% | 15.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIVO.L achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than CSWG.L's -0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MIVO.L has underperformed CSWG.L with an annualized return of 7.78%, while CSWG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.
MIVO.L
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 13.07%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
CSWG.L
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 8.20%
- 1Y
- 13.39%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIVO.L vs. CSWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIVO.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CSWG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MIVO.L vs. CSWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MIVO.L
CSWG.L
MIVO.L vs. CSWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) and Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIVO.L | CSWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.99 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 1.38 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 0.88 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | 3.17 | +2.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIVO.L | CSWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.99 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.75 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 1.04 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.03 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIVO.L and CSWG.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MIVO.L vs. CSWG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MIVO.L nor CSWG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MIVO.L vs. CSWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIVO.L drawdown since its inception was -24.30%, which is greater than CSWG.L's maximum drawdown of -18.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIVO.L and CSWG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIVO.L | CSWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.30% | -18.31% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -12.52% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.54% | -16.26% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.30% | -18.31% | -5.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.35% | -8.17% | +3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -4.12% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 3.48% | -1.14% |
Volatility
MIVO.L vs. CSWG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS (MIVO.L) is 4.22%, while Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that MIVO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIVO.L | CSWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 5.68% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | 9.38% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 14.04% | -3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 14.34% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.26% | 18.76% | -6.50% |