PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MISL vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MISL vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MISL achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


MISL

1D
2.15%
1M
8.87%
YTD
9.91%
6M
13.69%
1Y
34.75%
3Y*
29.55%
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MISL vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
9.91%41.24%20.48%14.78%8.22%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%1.27%-2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MISL and UGA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022

0.05

The correlation between MISL and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MISL vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MISL
MISL Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MISL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
MISL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MISL vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MISLUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

5.37

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

12.86

-6.99

MISL vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISL Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISL and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MISLUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.27

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.12

+1.27

Drawdowns

MISL vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MISLUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.91%

-86.59%

+68.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-14.88%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-26.68%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-14.75%

+6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-36.76%

+33.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.93%

6.20%

-0.27%

Volatility

MISL vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) is 8.58%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that MISL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MISLUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

11.64%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

30.48%

-11.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.66%

35.27%

-12.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

34.40%

-15.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

37.27%

-18.11%

MISL vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MISL vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MISL
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.35%0.40%0.74%0.63%0.08%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MISL and UGA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to MISL (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISL dropped -17.91% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 3-year performance, MISL leads with 29.55% vs 20.80% for UGA. On fees, MISL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, MISL has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MISL has performed better with a 29.55% return vs 20.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MISL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

MISL has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

MISL is categorized as Industrials Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. MISL tracks Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MISL and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MISL and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer