MISL vs. FXR
MISL (First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF) and FXR (First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund) are both Industrials Equities funds from First Trust - MISL tracks the Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross while FXR tracks the StrataQuant Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MISL returned 28.35%/yr vs 16.51%/yr for FXR. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MISL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXR.
Performance
MISL vs. FXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MISL achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than FXR's 8.45% return.
MISL
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 32.38%
- 3Y*
- 28.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXR
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
MISL vs. FXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 7.59% | 41.24% | 20.48% | 14.78% | 8.22% |
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 8.45% | 7.56% | 16.19% | 26.98% | 3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MISL and FXR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022 | 0.69 |
The correlation between MISL and FXR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
MISL vs. FXR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MISL
FXR
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
MISL
FXR
Technology
MISL
FXR
Basic Materials
MISL
-
FXR
Communication Services
MISL
-
FXR
-
Consumer Cyclical
MISL
-
FXR
Consumer Defensive
MISL
-
FXR
-
Energy
MISL
-
FXR
-
Financial Services
MISL
-
FXR
Healthcare
MISL
-
FXR
Real Estate
MISL
-
FXR
-
Utilities
MISL
-
FXR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MISL vs. FXR — Risk / Return Rank
MISL
FXR
MISL vs. FXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) and First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MISL | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.51 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 4.82 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MISL | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.09 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.37 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
MISL vs. FXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MISL drawdown since its inception was -17.91%, smaller than the maximum FXR drawdown of -63.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISL and FXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MISL | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.91% | -63.81% | +45.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.69% | -13.66% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -26.65% | +8.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.75% | -5.35% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -10.35% | +6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.91% | 4.27% | +1.64% |
Volatility
MISL vs. FXR - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF (MISL) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) at 5.52%. This indicates that MISL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MISL | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 5.52% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.14% | 14.61% | +4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.60% | 18.98% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 20.57% | -1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 21.92% | -2.78% |
MISL vs. FXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MISL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FXR's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
MISL vs. FXR - Dividend Comparison
MISL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than FXR's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 0.63% | 0.71% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 1.06% | 0.74% | 1.18% | 0.55% | 0.52% | 0.62% |
MISL First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 0.74% | 0.63% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MISL and FXR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MISL has higher volatility (8.50%) compared to FXR (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISL dropped -17.91% vs FXR's -63.81%.
On 3-year performance, MISL leads with 28.35% vs 16.51% for FXR. On fees, MISL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FXR has been the lower-risk option at 5.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MISL has performed better with a 28.35% return vs 16.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MISL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.
FXR has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.36% for MISL.
MISL tracks Indxx US Aerospace & Defense Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MISL and 0.64% for FXR.
MISL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MISL and FXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer