PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MISEX vs. MUHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MISEX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Midas Magic (MISEX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MISEX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MISEX
Midas Magic
-7.12%29.83%26.58%32.71%-23.29%38.28%13.69%33.49%-11.36%17.90%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
9.11%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%28.98%11.96%14.39%-13.29%18.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MISEX achieves a -7.12% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 9.11% return. Over the past 10 years, MISEX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 14.17%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.


MISEX

1D
3.83%
1M
-7.05%
YTD
-7.12%
6M
-0.96%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
24.67%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
14.17%

MUHLX

1D
2.42%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
9.11%
6M
10.37%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
12.05%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MISEX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MISEX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MISEX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MISEX
MISEX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MISEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MISEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MISEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MISEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MISEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MISEX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Midas Magic (MISEX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MISEXMUHLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.42

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

1.97

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.37

-0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.74

8.57

-2.83

MISEX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MISEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MISEX and MUHLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MISEXMUHLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.42

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.82

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.63

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.51

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between MISEX and MUHLX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MISEX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

MISEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than MUHLX's 3.06% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MISEX
Midas Magic
9.64%8.95%2.03%2.17%5.23%6.96%2.81%4.69%4.49%2.79%23.93%23.05%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
3.06%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%

Drawdowns

MISEX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MISEX drawdown since its inception was -71.80%, which is greater than MUHLX's maximum drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISEX and MUHLX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MISEXMUHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.80%

-62.05%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.98%

-10.23%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.37%

-18.63%

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.11%

-40.85%

-2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.80%

-5.65%

-8.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.50%

-10.81%

-10.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

2.83%

+1.51%

Volatility

MISEX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

Midas Magic (MISEX) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) at 6.01%. This indicates that MISEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MISEXMUHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

6.01%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

12.06%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

16.85%

+5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

14.77%

+6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.40%

17.04%

+6.36%