MISEX vs. FEQHX
MISEX (Midas Magic) and FEQHX (Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, MISEX returned 29.26%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for FEQHX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MISEX charges 2.95%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FEQHX.
Performance
MISEX vs. FEQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MISEX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than FEQHX's 10.01% return.
MISEX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 44.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.60%
- 10Y*
- 16.31%
FEQHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MISEX vs. FEQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MISEX Midas Magic | 10.91% | 29.83% | 26.58% | 32.71% | -4.80% |
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 10.01% | 13.61% | 19.46% | 17.65% | -4.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between MISEX and FEQHX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MISEX and FEQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MISEX vs. FEQHX — Risk / Return Rank
MISEX
FEQHX
MISEX vs. FEQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Midas Magic (MISEX) and Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MISEX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.11 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 12.42 | -2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MISEX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.52 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.32 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
MISEX vs. FEQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MISEX drawdown since its inception was -71.80%, which is greater than FEQHX's maximum drawdown of -10.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MISEX and FEQHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MISEX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.80% | -10.42% | -61.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.98% | -7.40% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | -10.42% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | 0.00% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.42% | -2.22% | -19.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 1.85% | +2.55% |
Volatility
MISEX vs. FEQHX - Volatility Comparison
Midas Magic (MISEX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund (FEQHX) at 2.68%. This indicates that MISEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MISEX | FEQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 2.68% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.11% | 6.63% | +7.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 9.15% | +9.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 11.24% | +10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.49% | 11.24% | +12.25% |
MISEX vs. FEQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MISEX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEQHX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
MISEX vs. FEQHX - Dividend Comparison
MISEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%, more than FEQHX's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEQHX Fidelity Hedged Equity Fund | 0.51% | 0.43% | 0.61% | 0.77% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MISEX Midas Magic | 8.07% | 8.95% | 2.03% | 2.17% | 5.23% | 6.96% | 2.81% | 4.69% | 4.49% | 2.79% | 23.93% | 23.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MISEX and FEQHX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MISEX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to FEQHX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MISEX dropped -71.80% vs FEQHX's -10.42%.
FEQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MISEX and FEQHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer