MINY vs. QYLD
MINY (YieldMax Strategic Metals & Mining Portfolio Option Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MINY is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. MINY is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MINY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
MINY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MINY
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -13.34%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 22.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
MINY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MINY YieldMax Strategic Metals & Mining Portfolio Option Income ETF | -17.07% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINY and QYLD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
MINY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QYLD
MINY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Strategic Metals & Mining Portfolio Option Income ETF (MINY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MINY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MINY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINY drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINY and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -24.75% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.64% | -1.84% | -15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -3.82% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.93% | — |
Volatility
MINY vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINY | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.39% | 10.10% | +25.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.39% | 14.90% | +20.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.39% | 15.55% | +19.84% |
MINY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
MINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, more than QYLD's 11.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINY YieldMax Strategic Metals & Mining Portfolio Option Income ETF | 11.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.59% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MINY.
MINY has the higher dividend yield at 11.81%, compared with 11.59% for QYLD.
MINY is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for MINY and 0.60% for QYLD.
Find the right allocation for MINY and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer