MINV vs. VPL
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL).
MINV and VPL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MINV is an actively managed fund by Matthews. It was launched on Jul 13, 2022. VPL is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005.
Performance
MINV vs. VPL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MINV vs. VPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | 7.75% | 30.85% | 17.32% | -2.66% | -3.11% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 8.11% | 32.66% | 1.68% | 15.58% | 5.38% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MINV having a 7.75% return and VPL slightly higher at 8.11%.
MINV
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -7.80%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 38.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VPL
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- -10.28%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 39.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MINV vs. VPL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VPL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MINV vs. VPL — Risk / Return Rank
MINV
VPL
MINV vs. VPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINV | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 1.95 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.58 | -0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.91 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 11.94 | -3.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINV | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.95 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.30 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between MINV and VPL is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MINV vs. VPL - Dividend Comparison
MINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than VPL's 3.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | 1.40% | 1.51% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | 3.28% | 4.01% | 3.15% | 3.12% | 2.75% | 3.19% | 1.81% | 2.84% | 3.06% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
MINV vs. VPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINV drawdown since its inception was -23.49%, smaller than the maximum VPL drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV and VPL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINV | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.49% | -55.49% | +32.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -13.33% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.84% | -10.28% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -11.71% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 3.25% | +1.24% |
Volatility
MINV vs. VPL - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a higher volatility of 11.61% compared to Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) at 10.59%. This indicates that MINV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MINV | VPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.61% | 10.59% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.15% | 14.73% | +3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.14% | 20.49% | +3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 16.81% | +6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 17.10% | +5.85% |