PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINV vs. JPAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINV vs. JPAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINV achieves a 55.42% return, which is significantly higher than JPAN's 17.24% return.


MINV

1D
-7.65%
1M
4.13%
YTD
55.42%
6M
56.47%
1Y
84.63%
3Y*
33.92%
5Y*
10Y*

JPAN

1D
-3.95%
1M
1.40%
YTD
17.24%
6M
16.10%
1Y
32.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINV vs. JPAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
55.42%30.85%17.32%7.48%
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
17.24%22.96%18.16%5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MINV and JPAN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.53

The correlation between MINV and JPAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

MINV vs. JPAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MINV
JPAN

Technology

67.2%
22.4%

Industrials

19.2%
24.2%

Healthcare

4.6%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
14.9%

Communication Services

2.3%
7.0%

Energy

1.7%
0.7%

Financial Services

1.4%
17.4%

Basic Materials

0.8%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

MINV
67.2%
JPAN
22.4%

Industrials

MINV
19.2%
JPAN
24.2%

Healthcare

MINV
4.6%
JPAN
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MINV
3.7%
JPAN
14.9%

Communication Services

MINV
2.3%
JPAN
7.0%

Energy

MINV
1.7%
JPAN
0.7%

Financial Services

MINV
1.4%
JPAN
17.4%

Basic Materials

MINV
0.8%
JPAN
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

MINV

-

JPAN
3.3%

Real Estate

MINV

-

JPAN
2.2%

Utilities

MINV

-

JPAN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINV vs. JPAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINV
MINV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

JPAN
JPAN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JPAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JPAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINV vs. JPAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MINVJPANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.29

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.80

2.23

+5.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.55

7.90

+11.65

MINV vs. JPAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINV Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the JPAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINV and JPAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MINV vs. JPAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINV drawdown since its inception was -23.49%, which is greater than JPAN's maximum drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV and JPAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINVJPANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.49%

-15.24%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-14.59%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.65%

-3.95%

-3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-3.09%

-4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

4.12%

+0.22%

Volatility

MINV vs. JPAN - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a higher volatility of 16.99% compared to Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) at 7.60%. This indicates that MINV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINVJPANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.99%

7.60%

+9.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.92%

17.06%

+8.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.06%

20.60%

+8.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.78%

19.53%

+5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.78%

19.53%

+5.25%

MINV vs. JPAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MINV and JPAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

MINV vs. JPAN - Dividend Comparison

MINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than JPAN's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
4.35%5.10%1.53%0.51%
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
0.97%1.51%0.25%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINV and JPAN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINV has higher volatility (16.99%) compared to JPAN (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINV dropped -23.49% vs JPAN's -15.24%.

On 1-year performance, MINV leads with 84.63% vs 32.46% for JPAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, JPAN has been the lower-risk option at 7.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MINV has performed better with a 84.63% return vs 32.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MINV and JPAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

JPAN has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.97% for MINV.

MINV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while JPAN is Japan Equities.

MINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINV and JPAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer