PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MINV vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MINV vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINV achieves a 58.70% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 28.91% return.


MINV

1D
-1.11%
1M
14.54%
YTD
58.70%
6M
60.02%
1Y
93.90%
3Y*
34.15%
5Y*
10Y*

GRID

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.85%
YTD
28.91%
6M
29.60%
1Y
51.55%
3Y*
26.27%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
19.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MINV vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
58.70%30.85%17.32%-2.66%-3.11%
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
28.91%29.65%15.18%21.57%14.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MINV and GRID is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022

0.64

The correlation between MINV and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

MINV vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MINV
GRID

Technology

62.8%
11.0%

Industrials

17.8%
65.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
3.5%

Healthcare

3.0%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Energy

1.5%

-

Financial Services

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

0.8%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

20.4%

Technology

MINV
62.8%
GRID
11.0%

Industrials

MINV
17.8%
GRID
65.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MINV
3.5%
GRID
3.5%

Healthcare

MINV
3.0%
GRID

-

Communication Services

MINV
2.2%
GRID

-

Energy

MINV
1.5%
GRID

-

Financial Services

MINV
1.2%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

MINV
0.8%
GRID
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

MINV

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

MINV

-

GRID

-

Utilities

MINV

-

GRID
20.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MINV vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINV
MINV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MINV vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MINVGRIDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.76

2.67

+1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.54

3.50

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.45

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.68

4.42

+4.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.03

16.72

+6.31

MINV vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MINV Sharpe Ratio is 3.76, which is higher than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINV and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MINVGRIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76

2.67

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.57

+0.44

Drawdowns

MINV vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINV drawdown since its inception was -23.49%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MINVGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.49%

-40.56%

+17.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-11.73%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.82%

-20.77%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-1.33%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-8.43%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.09%

3.09%

+1.00%

Volatility

MINV vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) at 7.95%. This indicates that MINV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MINVGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.63%

7.95%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.20%

16.08%

+5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.11%

19.39%

+5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.74%

21.00%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.74%

22.81%

+0.93%

MINV vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MINV vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

MINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index
0.77%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
MINV
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
0.95%1.51%0.25%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MINV and GRID have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MINV has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to GRID (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINV dropped -23.49% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 3-year performance, MINV leads with 34.15% vs 26.27% for GRID. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MINV has performed better with a 34.15% return vs 26.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MINV.

MINV has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.

MINV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MINV and 0.70% for GRID.

MINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MINV and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer