MINV vs. GRID
MINV (Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF) and GRID (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index) are both exchange-traded funds - MINV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while GRID is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. MINV is actively managed, while GRID is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MINV returned 34.15%/yr vs 26.27%/yr for GRID. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MINV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GRID.
Performance
MINV vs. GRID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MINV achieves a 58.70% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 28.91% return.
MINV
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 14.54%
- YTD
- 58.70%
- 6M
- 60.02%
- 1Y
- 93.90%
- 3Y*
- 34.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRID
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 28.91%
- 6M
- 29.60%
- 1Y
- 51.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.76%
MINV vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | 58.70% | 30.85% | 17.32% | -2.66% | -3.11% |
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 28.91% | 29.65% | 15.18% | 21.57% | 14.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between MINV and GRID is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between MINV and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
MINV vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MINV
GRID
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MINV
GRID
Industrials
MINV
GRID
Consumer Cyclical
MINV
GRID
Healthcare
MINV
GRID
-
Communication Services
MINV
GRID
-
Energy
MINV
GRID
-
Financial Services
MINV
GRID
-
Basic Materials
MINV
GRID
Consumer Defensive
MINV
-
GRID
-
Real Estate
MINV
-
GRID
-
Utilities
MINV
-
GRID
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MINV vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank
MINV
GRID
MINV vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MINV | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.76 | 2.67 | +1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.54 | 3.50 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.45 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.68 | 4.42 | +4.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.03 | 16.72 | +6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MINV | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76 | 2.67 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.57 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
MINV vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MINV drawdown since its inception was -23.49%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINV and GRID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MINV | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.49% | -40.56% | +17.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -11.73% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.82% | -20.77% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -1.33% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -8.43% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 3.09% | +1.00% |
Volatility
MINV vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index (GRID) at 7.95%. This indicates that MINV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MINV | GRID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 7.95% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.20% | 16.08% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.11% | 19.39% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 21.00% | +2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 22.81% | +0.93% |
MINV vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison
MINV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
MINV vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison
MINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than GRID's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRID First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart GRID Infrastructure Index | 0.77% | 1.01% | 1.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 1.26% | 1.28% | 1.07% | 1.07% | 1.23% |
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | 0.95% | 1.51% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MINV and GRID have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MINV has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to GRID (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MINV dropped -23.49% vs GRID's -40.56%.
On 3-year performance, MINV leads with 34.15% vs 26.27% for GRID. On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MINV has performed better with a 34.15% return vs 26.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MINV.
MINV has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.77% for GRID.
MINV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Matthews and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MINV and 0.70% for GRID.
MINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MINV and GRID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer