MILK vs. FLRN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MILK (Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF) and FLRN (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - MILK tracks the Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index while FLRN tracks the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MILK returned 9.23% vs 4.88% for FLRN. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MILK charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLRN.

Performance

MILK vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MILK achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than FLRN's 1.87% return.

MILK

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 2.18%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 9.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLRN

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 4.88%
• 3Y*: 5.67%
• 5Y*: 4.19%
• 10Y*: 3.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MILK vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	2.18%	7.49%	-0.35%
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.87%	5.01%	0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MILK and FLRN is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.30

Return for Risk

MILK vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MILK

MILK Risk / Return Rank: 52
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FLRN

FLRN Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLRN Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MILK vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MILK	FLRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	7.18	-5.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	13.18	-10.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	3.44	-2.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	21.54	-19.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.90	130.06	-121.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MILK vs. FLRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MILK Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the FLRN Sharpe Ratio of 7.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MILK and FLRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MILK	FLRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	7.18	-5.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.50	+0.47

Drawdowns

MILK vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MILK drawdown since its inception was -6.16%, smaller than the maximum FLRN drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILK and FLRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MILK	FLRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-14.64%	+8.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.75%	-0.23%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	0.00%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-1.83%	+0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.04%	+1.00%

Volatility

MILK vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.15%. This indicates that MILK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MILK	FLRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	0.15%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.78%	0.52%	+3.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.21%	0.68%	+4.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.69%	1.69%	+5.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.69%	4.20%	+2.49%

MILK vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MILK has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

MILK vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison

MILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than FLRN's 4.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.51%	4.89%	5.67%	5.68%	1.95%	0.39%	1.22%	2.76%	2.39%	1.64%	1.06%	0.63%
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	7.04%	6.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MILK and FLRN in my portfolio?

MILK and FLRN have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MILK or FLRN?

MILK has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to FLRN (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MILK dropped -6.16% vs FLRN's -14.64%.

Which ETF is better, MILK or FLRN?

On 1-year performance, MILK leads with 9.23% vs 4.88% for FLRN. On fees, FLRN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MILK or FLRN?

Over the 1-year period, MILK has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MILK or FLRN?

FLRN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MILK or FLRN?

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 4.51% for FLRN.

What is the main difference between MILK and FLRN?

MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index, while FLRN tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes (<5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MILK and 0.15% for FLRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.18 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.