MILK vs. COWZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MILK (Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MILK is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MILK returned 9.23% vs 22.23% for COWZ. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

MILK vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MILK achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 8.18% return.

MILK

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 2.18%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 9.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COWZ

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 22.23%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MILK vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	2.18%	7.49%	-0.35%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	8.18%	8.98%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MILK and COWZ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.37

Return for Risk

MILK vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MILK

MILK Risk / Return Rank: 52
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 53

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 65
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 57
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MILK vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MILK	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.02	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.98	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.36	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	4.46	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.90	12.19	-3.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MILK vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MILK Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MILK and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MILK	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	2.02	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.65	+0.32

Drawdowns

MILK vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MILK drawdown since its inception was -6.16%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILK and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MILK	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-38.63%	+32.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.75%	-5.00%	+1.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.91%	+0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-4.81%	+3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	1.83%	-0.79%

Volatility

MILK vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) is 1.58%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that MILK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MILK	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.58%	2.56%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.78%	7.12%	-3.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.21%	11.13%	-5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.69%	17.63%	-10.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.69%	19.93%	-13.24%

MILK vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MILK and COWZ have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

MILK vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

MILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than COWZ's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.99%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	7.04%	6.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MILK and COWZ in my portfolio?

MILK and COWZ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MILK or COWZ?

COWZ has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to MILK (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MILK dropped -6.16% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which ETF is better, MILK or COWZ?

On 1-year performance, COWZ leads with 22.23% vs 9.23% for MILK. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, MILK has been the lower-risk option at 1.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MILK or COWZ?

Over the 1-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 22.23% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MILK or COWZ?

MILK and COWZ have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MILK or COWZ?

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 1.99% for COWZ.

What is the main difference between MILK and COWZ?

MILK is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.