MIIBX vs. GTSGX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

MIIBX (Madison High Quality Bond Fund) and GTSGX (Madison Mid Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - MIIBX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Madison Funds, while GTSGX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Madison Funds. Over the past 10 years, MIIBX returned 1.34%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for GTSGX. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. MIIBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GTSGX.

Performance

MIIBX vs. GTSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIIBX achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than GTSGX's 4.16% return. Over the past 10 years, MIIBX has underperformed GTSGX with an annualized return of 1.34%, while GTSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return.

MIIBX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.24%
• 6M: -0.16%
• YTD: -0.16%
• 1Y: 2.58%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: 0.93%
• 10Y*: 1.34%

GTSGX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 4.10%
• 6M: -0.12%
• YTD: 4.16%
• 1Y: 3.45%
• 3Y*: 8.86%
• 5Y*: 7.49%
• 10Y*: 10.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIIBX vs. GTSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIIBX Madison High Quality Bond Fund	-0.16%	6.21%	2.74%	4.55%	-7.13%	-1.76%	4.50%	4.54%	0.91%	1.14%
GTSGX Madison Mid Cap Fund	4.16%	1.62%	10.24%	26.51%	-13.60%	26.31%	9.45%	33.53%	-1.60%	15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MIIBX and GTSGX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2000	-0.17

The correlation between MIIBX and GTSGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MIIBX vs. GTSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIIBX

MIIBX Risk / Return Rank: 28
MIIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MIIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MIIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MIIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
MIIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

GTSGX

GTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 5
GTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
GTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
GTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
GTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
GTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIIBX vs. GTSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX) and Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIIBX	GTSGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	0.23	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	0.45	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.05	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	0.29	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.04	0.68	+3.37

MIIBX vs. GTSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the GTSGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIIBX and GTSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIIBX vs. GTSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIIBX drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, smaller than the maximum GTSGX drawdown of -73.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIIBX and GTSGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIIBX	GTSGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.12%	-73.82%	+62.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.70%	-11.99%	+10.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.33%	-19.63%	+17.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.69%	-21.94%	+11.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.12%	-38.25%	+27.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.28%	-1.99%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.25%	-29.61%	+28.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.64%	5.09%	-4.45%

Volatility

MIIBX vs. GTSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX) is 0.67%, while Madison Mid Cap Fund (GTSGX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that MIIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIIBX	GTSGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	4.05%	-3.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.72%	10.52%	-8.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27%	14.90%	-12.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.54%	17.46%	-13.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.78%	18.05%	-15.27%

MIIBX vs. GTSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIIBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GTSGX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIIBX vs. GTSGX - Dividend Comparison

MIIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than GTSGX's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTSGX Madison Mid Cap Fund	3.23%	3.37%	5.76%	1.25%	1.96%	4.38%	3.43%	3.74%	7.57%	3.58%	4.34%	6.09%
MIIBX Madison High Quality Bond Fund	3.56%	3.34%	3.02%	2.17%	1.23%	1.54%	1.28%	1.87%	1.73%	1.41%	1.23%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIIBX and GTSGX in my portfolio?

MIIBX and GTSGX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MIIBX or GTSGX?

GTSGX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to MIIBX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIIBX dropped -11.12% vs GTSGX's -73.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MIIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.