MIIBX vs. MMDAX
MIIBX (Madison High Quality Bond Fund) and MMDAX (Madison Moderate Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - MIIBX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Madison Funds, while MMDAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Madison Funds. Over the past 10 years, MIIBX returned 1.35%/yr vs 6.56%/yr for MMDAX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. MIIBX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for MMDAX.
Performance
MIIBX vs. MMDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIIBX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than MMDAX's 8.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MIIBX has underperformed MMDAX with an annualized return of 1.35%, while MMDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.56% annualized return.
MIIBX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- 1.35%
MMDAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 8.63%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.56%
MIIBX vs. MMDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIIBX Madison High Quality Bond Fund | -0.11% | 6.21% | 2.74% | 4.55% | -7.13% | -1.76% | 4.50% | 4.54% | 0.91% | 1.14% |
MMDAX Madison Moderate Allocation Fund | 8.63% | 11.13% | 6.97% | 10.32% | -14.49% | 6.79% | 9.77% | 15.99% | -4.80% | 14.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIIBX and MMDAX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2006 | -0.03 |
The correlation between MIIBX and MMDAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIIBX vs. MMDAX — Risk / Return Rank
MIIBX
MMDAX
MIIBX vs. MMDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX) and Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIIBX | MMDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 2.50 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.66 | 10.50 | -5.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIIBX vs. MMDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIIBX drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, smaller than the maximum MMDAX drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIIBX and MMDAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIIBX | MMDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -43.12% | +32.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | -7.05% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.33% | -10.02% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.69% | -25.36% | +14.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.12% | -25.36% | +14.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -0.25% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -7.35% | +6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 1.67% | -1.06% |
Volatility
MIIBX vs. MMDAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Madison High Quality Bond Fund (MIIBX) is 0.65%, while Madison Moderate Allocation Fund (MMDAX) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that MIIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIIBX | MMDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | 3.46% | -2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.67% | 7.57% | -5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28% | 8.97% | -6.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 10.83% | -7.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 10.74% | -7.96% |
MIIBX vs. MMDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIIBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MMDAX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIIBX vs. MMDAX - Dividend Comparison
MIIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than MMDAX's 5.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIIBX Madison High Quality Bond Fund | 3.47% | 3.34% | 3.02% | 2.17% | 1.23% | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.87% | 1.73% | 1.41% | 1.23% | 1.35% |
MMDAX Madison Moderate Allocation Fund | 5.64% | 6.12% | 3.70% | 2.15% | 1.39% | 8.46% | 9.24% | 3.95% | 9.05% | 5.13% | 4.36% | 7.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIIBX and MMDAX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMDAX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to MIIBX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIIBX dropped -11.12% vs MMDAX's -43.12%.
MMDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIIBX and MMDAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer