MIIAX vs. WOBDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MIIAX (Praxis Impact Bond Fund) and WOBDX (JPMorgan Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, MIIAX returned 1.29%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for WOBDX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIIAX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WOBDX.

Performance

MIIAX vs. WOBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIIAX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than WOBDX's 0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MIIAX has underperformed WOBDX with an annualized return of 1.29%, while WOBDX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.90% annualized return.

MIIAX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.52%
• 1Y: 4.51%
• 3Y*: 3.76%
• 5Y*: -0.27%
• 10Y*: 1.29%

WOBDX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 0.55%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 4.62%
• 3Y*: 4.28%
• 5Y*: 0.38%
• 10Y*: 1.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIIAX vs. WOBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MIIAX Praxis Impact Bond Fund	0.43%	6.82%	1.17%	5.32%	-13.09%	-2.22%	7.45%	7.75%	-0.36%	3.11%
WOBDX JPMorgan Core Bond Fund	0.55%	7.38%	1.97%	5.79%	-12.35%	-1.11%	8.13%	8.34%	0.20%	3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MIIAX and WOBDX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 1999	0.93

The correlation between MIIAX and WOBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MIIAX vs. WOBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIIAX

MIIAX Risk / Return Rank: 20
MIIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MIIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MIIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MIIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MIIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

WOBDX

WOBDX Risk / Return Rank: 21
WOBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
WOBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
WOBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
WOBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
WOBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIIAX vs. WOBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MIIAX	WOBDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.25	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	1.87	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	1.59	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.38	4.44	-0.07

MIIAX vs. WOBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the WOBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIIAX and WOBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MIIAX vs. WOBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIIAX drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, which is greater than WOBDX's maximum drawdown of -16.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIIAX and WOBDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MIIAX	WOBDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.76%	-16.65%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.06%	-2.99%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.20%	-5.96%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.22%	-16.65%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.76%	-16.65%	-2.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.13%	-1.51%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-1.90%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	1.06%	0.00%

Volatility

MIIAX vs. WOBDX - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund (WOBDX) have volatilities of 1.14% and 1.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MIIAX	WOBDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	1.10%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.81%	2.81%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76%	3.80%	-0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.84%	5.70%	+0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.73%	4.71%	+0.02%

MIIAX vs. WOBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIIAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than WOBDX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MIIAX vs. WOBDX - Dividend Comparison

MIIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than WOBDX's 4.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MIIAX Praxis Impact Bond Fund	3.38%	3.28%	3.12%	2.35%	2.02%	1.50%	2.42%	2.15%	2.27%	2.19%	2.35%	2.55%
WOBDX JPMorgan Core Bond Fund	4.06%	3.97%	3.95%	3.51%	2.68%	2.82%	4.00%	3.23%	2.91%	2.88%	2.84%	2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MIIAX and WOBDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, MIIAX and WOBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MIIAX or WOBDX?

MIIAX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to WOBDX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIIAX dropped -18.76% vs WOBDX's -16.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WOBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.