MIIAX vs. MGAFX
MIIAX (Praxis Impact Bond Fund) and MGAFX (Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio) are both mutual funds - MIIAX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds, while MGAFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Praxis Mutual Funds. Over the past 10 years, MIIAX returned 1.24%/yr vs 11.15%/yr for MGAFX. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. MIIAX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for MGAFX.
Performance
MIIAX vs. MGAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIIAX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than MGAFX's 11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MIIAX has underperformed MGAFX with an annualized return of 1.24%, while MGAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.
MIIAX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.24%
MGAFX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 23.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
MIIAX vs. MGAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIIAX Praxis Impact Bond Fund | 0.22% | 6.82% | 1.17% | 5.32% | -13.09% | -2.22% | 7.45% | 7.75% | -0.36% | 3.11% |
MGAFX Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio | 11.29% | 15.50% | 11.51% | 16.96% | -17.05% | 24.51% | 14.09% | 24.08% | -6.55% | 16.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIIAX and MGAFX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010 | -0.07 |
The correlation between MIIAX and MGAFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIIAX vs. MGAFX — Risk / Return Rank
MIIAX
MGAFX
MIIAX vs. MGAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) and Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIIAX | MGAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.41 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 3.09 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.04 | 13.11 | -9.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIIAX vs. MGAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIIAX drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum MGAFX drawdown of -28.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIIAX and MGAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIIAX | MGAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -28.63% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -7.86% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.20% | -13.84% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -23.82% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.76% | -28.63% | +9.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -0.13% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.53% | -3.97% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.85% | -0.79% |
Volatility
MIIAX vs. MGAFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Praxis Impact Bond Fund (MIIAX) is 1.06%, while Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio (MGAFX) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that MIIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIIAX | MGAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 4.35% | -3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 8.95% | -6.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 10.93% | -7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.84% | 13.64% | -7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 14.16% | -9.42% |
MIIAX vs. MGAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIIAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than MGAFX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIIAX vs. MGAFX - Dividend Comparison
MIIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than MGAFX's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGAFX Praxis Genesis Growth Portfolio | 4.01% | 4.45% | 3.36% | 2.29% | 3.02% | 10.83% | 4.87% | 4.42% | 6.15% | 4.19% | 3.50% | 4.01% |
MIIAX Praxis Impact Bond Fund | 3.39% | 3.28% | 3.12% | 2.35% | 2.02% | 1.50% | 2.42% | 2.15% | 2.27% | 2.19% | 2.35% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIIAX and MGAFX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGAFX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to MIIAX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIIAX dropped -18.76% vs MGAFX's -28.63%.
MGAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIIAX and MGAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer