MIGO vs. ESN
MIGO (MIG Core ETF) and ESN (Essential 40 Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. MIGO is actively managed, while ESN is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIGO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ESN.
Performance
MIGO vs. ESN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MIGO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESN
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- YTD
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 23.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MIGO vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MIGO MIG Core ETF | 22.06% |
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIGO and ESN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIGO vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank
MIGO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ESN
MIGO vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIG Core ETF (MIGO) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIGO | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIGO vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIGO drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, roughly equal to the maximum ESN drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGO and ESN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIGO | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -13.60% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -1.13% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -1.83% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility
MIGO vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIGO | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.48% | 9.95% | +15.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 13.16% | +12.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 13.16% | +12.32% |
MIGO vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIGO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIGO vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison
MIGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF | 0.79% | 0.91% | 0.76% |
MIGO MIG Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIGO and ESN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MIGO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MIGO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.
ESN has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for MIGO.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and KKM Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MIGO and 0.70% for ESN.
Find the right allocation for MIGO and ESN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer