PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIGO vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIGO vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MIG Core ETF (MIGO) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MIGO

1D
1.51%
1M
-2.67%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

AFOS

1D
0.79%
1M
-2.57%
6M
16.56%
YTD
27.82%
1Y
64.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
66.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$478.32K$472.43K$519.92K
$37.24K$187.37K$376.73K

MIGO vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MIGO and AFOS is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIGO vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIGO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AFOS
AFOS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AFOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFOS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AFOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIGO vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MIG Core ETF (MIGO) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIGOAFOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.21

MIGO vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIGO vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIGO drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGO and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIGOAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.39%

-11.80%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

-6.55%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-1.80%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

Volatility

MIGO vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIGOAFOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.54%

23.16%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.54%

22.37%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.54%

22.37%

+3.17%

MIGO vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MIGO and AFOS have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

MIGO vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

MIGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM2025
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.23%0.30%
MIGO
MIG Core ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MIGO and AFOS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MIGO and AFOS have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for MIGO.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ARS Investment Partners.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIGO and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer