PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIESY vs. TMQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MIESY vs. TMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co Ltd ADR (MIESY) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIESY achieves a -35.89% return, which is significantly lower than TMQ's 10.90% return.


MIESY

1D
0.00%
1M
-37.34%
YTD
-35.89%
6M
-35.89%
1Y
160.89%
3Y*
98.87%
5Y*
43.84%
10Y*

TMQ

1D
0.42%
1M
7.42%
YTD
10.90%
6M
4.60%
1Y
288.62%
3Y*
110.89%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
25.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIESY vs. TMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MIESY
Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co Ltd ADR
-35.89%493.50%38.78%82.78%-36.21%29.70%-70.00%
TMQ
Trilogy Metals Inc.
10.90%271.55%169.77%-21.82%-66.67%-17.50%7.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MIESY and TMQ is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020

-0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MIESY:

$2.66B

TMQ:

$821.88M

EPS

MIESY:

$386.63

TMQ:

-$0.23

PB Ratio

MIESY:

0.01

TMQ:

6.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

MIESY:

$358.09B

TMQ:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

MIESY:

$70.42B

TMQ:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

MIESY:

$49.65B

TMQ:

-$7.33M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIESY vs. TMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIESY
MIESY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MIESY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIESY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIESY Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MIESY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIESY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TMQ
TMQ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIESY vs. TMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co Ltd ADR (MIESY) and Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIESYTMQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

1.24

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.64

4.69

+1.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

4.00

1.59

+2.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

4.33

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.65

6.51

+5.14

MIESY vs. TMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIESY Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the TMQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIESY and TMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIESYTMQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.24

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.09

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.00

+0.14

Drawdowns

MIESY vs. TMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIESY drawdown since its inception was -78.18%, smaller than the maximum TMQ drawdown of -96.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIESY and TMQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIESYTMQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.18%

-96.55%

+18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.28%

-69.62%

+19.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.56%

-69.62%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.56%

-87.53%

+26.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.28%

-54.91%

+4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.64%

-71.96%

+17.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.81%

46.35%

-32.54%

Volatility

MIESY vs. TMQ - Volatility Comparison

Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co Ltd ADR (MIESY) has a higher volatility of 32.21% compared to Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) at 19.59%. This indicates that MIESY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIESYTMQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.21%

19.59%

+12.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.90%

57.30%

-18.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

233.18%

234.83%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

120.08%

128.30%

-8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

116.10%

101.05%

+15.05%

Dividends

MIESY vs. TMQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither MIESY nor TMQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MIESY vs. TMQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding Co Ltd ADR and Trilogy Metals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
101.85B
0
(MIESY) Total Revenue
(TMQ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MIESY and TMQ have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIESY has higher volatility (32.21%) compared to TMQ (19.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIESY dropped -78.18% vs TMQ's -96.55%.

TMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIESY and TMQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer