MIELY vs. GFI
MIELY (Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. MIELY operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, MIELY returned 12.21%/yr vs 26.67%/yr for GFI. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MIELY vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIELY achieves a 24.47% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, MIELY has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 12.21%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 26.67% annualized return.
MIELY
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -14.11%
- YTD
- 24.47%
- 6M
- 22.62%
- 1Y
- 77.00%
- 3Y*
- 37.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.88%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
GFI
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -15.43%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- 51.45%
- 3Y*
- 36.70%
- 5Y*
- 31.29%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
MIELY vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIELY Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR | 24.47% | 73.08% | 21.33% | 42.15% | -22.04% | -16.17% | 11.35% | 23.78% | -33.88% | 21.11% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -15.43% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIELY and GFI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007 | 0.06 |
The correlation between MIELY and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MIELY:
$72.64B
GFI:
$32.09B
MIELY:
$421.28
GFI:
$5.39
MIELY:
0.17
GFI:
6.66
MIELY:
0.01
GFI:
0.11
MIELY:
0.01
GFI:
2.30
MIELY:
0.02
GFI:
3.81
MIELY:
$5.95T
GFI:
$13.98B
MIELY:
$1.97T
GFI:
$7.34B
MIELY:
$639.91B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIELY vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
MIELY
GFI
MIELY vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR (MIELY) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIELY | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.06 | 1.29 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 3.29 | +10.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIELY | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 0.87 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.60 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.49 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.12 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
MIELY vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIELY drawdown since its inception was -89.09%, roughly equal to the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIELY and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIELY | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.09% | -88.05% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.08% | -39.97% | +20.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.66% | -39.97% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.47% | -56.22% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.76% | -63.09% | +7.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.96% | -39.97% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.46% | -44.26% | -25.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | 15.69% | -10.10% |
Volatility
MIELY vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR (MIELY) is 12.39%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 15.34%. This indicates that MIELY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIELY | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.39% | 15.34% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.92% | 45.82% | -15.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.77% | 59.39% | -22.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.34% | 52.26% | -20.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.08% | 54.86% | -25.78% |
Dividends
MIELY vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
MIELY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.13% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
MIELY Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 1.76% | 0.00% |
Financials
MIELY vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MIELY vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
MIELY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 569.69B and revenue of 1.77T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.2%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
MIELY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR reported an operating income of 161.29B and revenue of 1.77T, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
MIELY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mitsubishi Electric Corp ADR reported a net income of 132.06B and revenue of 1.77T, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MIELY and GFI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to MIELY (12.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIELY dropped -89.09% vs GFI's -88.05%.
MIELY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIELY and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer