MIDU vs. NFLT
MIDU (Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares) and NFLT (Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MIDU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%), while NFLT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Virtus. MIDU is passively managed, while NFLT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, MIDU returned 12.76%/yr vs 4.09%/yr for NFLT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MIDU charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NFLT.
Performance
MIDU vs. NFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDU achieves a 41.54% return, which is significantly higher than NFLT's 1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDU has outperformed NFLT with an annualized return of 12.76%, while NFLT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.09% annualized return.
MIDU
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 10.51%
- YTD
- 41.54%
- 6M
- 35.51%
- 1Y
- 66.94%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
NFLT
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 7.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 4.09%
MIDU vs. NFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 41.54% | -2.75% | 20.32% | 27.79% | -49.27% | 72.89% | -18.31% | 77.38% | -39.21% | 46.86% |
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.75% | 8.77% | 6.05% | 9.16% | -9.49% | 1.18% | 8.02% | 10.13% | -2.68% | 6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDU and NFLT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2015 | 0.19 |
The correlation between MIDU and NFLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MIDU vs. NFLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIDU
NFLT
Industrials
-
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Industrials
MIDU
NFLT
-
Technology
MIDU
NFLT
Financial Services
MIDU
NFLT
Consumer Cyclical
MIDU
NFLT
-
Healthcare
MIDU
NFLT
Real Estate
MIDU
NFLT
Energy
MIDU
NFLT
-
Basic Materials
MIDU
NFLT
-
Consumer Defensive
MIDU
NFLT
-
Utilities
MIDU
NFLT
Communication Services
MIDU
NFLT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDU vs. NFLT — Risk / Return Rank
MIDU
NFLT
MIDU vs. NFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) and Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MIDU | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.26 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 14.29 | -5.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MIDU vs. NFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDU drawdown since its inception was -86.26%, which is greater than NFLT's maximum drawdown of -15.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDU and NFLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDU | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.26% | -15.17% | -71.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.80% | -2.42% | -23.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.41% | -3.24% | -57.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.14% | -13.42% | -50.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.26% | -15.17% | -71.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -0.65% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.41% | -2.10% | -20.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 0.55% | +7.22% |
Volatility
MIDU vs. NFLT - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) has a higher volatility of 15.07% compared to Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF (NFLT) at 1.64%. This indicates that MIDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDU | NFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.07% | 1.64% | +13.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.90% | 3.12% | +31.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.43% | 4.20% | +43.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.59% | 4.47% | +55.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.65% | 4.95% | +58.70% |
MIDU vs. NFLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDU has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than NFLT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MIDU vs. NFLT - Dividend Comparison
MIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than NFLT's 5.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDU Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.63% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.71% | 0.70% | 2.67% | 1.89% | 0.00% |
NFLT Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 5.48% | 5.74% | 5.76% | 6.02% | 4.16% | 3.41% | 3.63% | 4.33% | 4.81% | 6.23% | 5.30% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDU and NFLT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MIDU has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to NFLT (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDU dropped -86.26% vs NFLT's -15.17%.
On 10-year performance, MIDU leads with 12.76% vs 4.09% for NFLT. On fees, NFLT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NFLT has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MIDU has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NFLT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.
NFLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 0.63% for MIDU.
MIDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NFLT is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for MIDU and 0.50% for NFLT.
NFLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIDU and NFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer