MIDSX vs. OCMGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Midas Fund (MIDSX) and OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX).
MIDSX is managed by Midas. It was launched on Jan 7, 1986. OCMGX is managed by OCM. It was launched on Feb 3, 1988.
Performance
MIDSX vs. OCMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIDSX vs. OCMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDSX Midas Fund | 3.72% | 195.76% | 7.27% | -1.79% | -11.11% | -19.23% | 10.64% | 30.56% | -12.90% | 5.98% |
OCMGX OCM Gold Fund | 0.27% | 167.05% | 23.15% | 4.21% | -17.71% | -9.67% | 44.28% | 56.74% | -13.84% | 9.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDSX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than OCMGX's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDSX has underperformed OCMGX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while OCMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.86% annualized return.
MIDSX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -25.21%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 115.48%
- 3Y*
- 44.09%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
OCMGX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -23.44%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 19.45%
- 1Y
- 95.04%
- 3Y*
- 45.40%
- 5Y*
- 23.97%
- 10Y*
- 18.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIDSX vs. OCMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDSX has a 4.25% expense ratio, which is higher than OCMGX's 2.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MIDSX vs. OCMGX — Risk / Return Rank
MIDSX
OCMGX
MIDSX vs. OCMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Midas Fund (MIDSX) and OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDSX | OCMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.65 | 2.49 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | 2.70 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.40 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 3.44 | +0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.42 | 12.75 | +1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDSX | OCMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.49 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.71 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.56 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.12 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDSX and OCMGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIDSX vs. OCMGX - Dividend Comparison
MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OCMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDSX Midas Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OCMGX OCM Gold Fund | 6.49% | 6.50% | 2.88% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.07% | 0.98% | 6.33% | 26.98% | 7.19% | 19.53% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
MIDSX vs. OCMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDSX drawdown since its inception was -89.77%, which is greater than OCMGX's maximum drawdown of -84.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDSX and OCMGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDSX | OCMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.77% | -84.47% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.18% | -27.33% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.48% | -45.55% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.07% | -45.55% | -11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.30% | -23.54% | -16.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -41.28% | -22.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.19% | 7.38% | +0.81% |
Volatility
MIDSX vs. OCMGX - Volatility Comparison
Midas Fund (MIDSX) has a higher volatility of 15.85% compared to OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) at 13.80%. This indicates that MIDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIDSX | OCMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.85% | 13.80% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.12% | 30.94% | +5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.35% | 38.99% | +5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.89% | 33.84% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.34% | 33.85% | -0.51% |