PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDSX vs. FEGOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDSX vs. FEGOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Midas Fund (MIDSX) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class C (FEGOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDSX achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly higher than FEGOX's -3.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDSX has underperformed FEGOX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while FEGOX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.


MIDSX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
-5.72%
1Y
63.21%
3Y*
46.08%
5Y*
20.01%
10Y*
9.79%

FEGOX

1D
-1.12%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
-3.45%
6M
-7.46%
1Y
47.68%
3Y*
35.72%
5Y*
19.10%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDSX vs. FEGOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDSX
Midas Fund
-0.86%195.76%7.27%-1.79%-11.11%-19.23%10.64%30.56%-12.90%5.98%
FEGOX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class C
-3.45%126.68%9.47%6.26%-2.33%-8.41%28.65%37.47%-16.58%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDSX and FEGOX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2003

0.91

The correlation between MIDSX and FEGOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDSX vs. FEGOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDSX
MIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FEGOX
FEGOX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FEGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FEGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDSX vs. FEGOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Midas Fund (MIDSX) and First Eagle Gold Fund Class C (FEGOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIDSXFEGOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.50

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

4.10

+0.89

MIDSX vs. FEGOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the FEGOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDSX and FEGOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIDSX vs. FEGOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDSX drawdown since its inception was -89.77%, which is greater than FEGOX's maximum drawdown of -71.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDSX and FEGOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDSXFEGOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.77%

-71.67%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.99%

-32.53%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.99%

-32.53%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.33%

-34.24%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.07%

-43.08%

-13.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.94%

-27.19%

-15.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.48%

-31.31%

-32.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.02%

11.89%

+1.13%

Volatility

MIDSX vs. FEGOX - Volatility Comparison

Midas Fund (MIDSX) has a higher volatility of 17.82% compared to First Eagle Gold Fund Class C (FEGOX) at 13.38%. This indicates that MIDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEGOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDSXFEGOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.82%

13.38%

+4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.39%

34.10%

+5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.22%

39.83%

+6.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.04%

29.12%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.61%

27.40%

+6.21%

MIDSX vs. FEGOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDSX has a 4.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FEGOX's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDSX vs. FEGOX - Dividend Comparison

MIDSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FEGOX
First Eagle Gold Fund Class C
0.72%0.70%5.05%0.22%0.00%0.24%0.76%
MIDSX
Midas Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, MIDSX and FEGOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MIDSX has higher volatility (17.82%) compared to FEGOX (13.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDSX dropped -89.77% vs FEGOX's -71.67%.

MIDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDSX and FEGOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer