PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDLX vs. SMCWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDLX vs. SMCWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDLX achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than SMCWX's 12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDLX has underperformed SMCWX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while SMCWX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


MIDLX

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.95%
6M
7.96%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
6.86%

SMCWX

1D
0.63%
1M
2.81%
YTD
12.78%
6M
13.38%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
12.91%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDLX vs. SMCWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
6.95%17.03%3.33%13.21%-18.52%5.17%10.15%24.97%-10.29%30.65%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
12.78%14.07%2.33%18.86%-29.90%10.14%37.46%30.79%-9.75%26.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDLX and SMCWX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2012

0.80

The correlation between MIDLX and SMCWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDLX vs. SMCWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDLX
MIDLX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MIDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCWX
SMCWX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SMCWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCWX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDLX vs. SMCWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDLXSMCWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.30

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

2.23

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.17

8.94

-5.78

MIDLX vs. SMCWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the SMCWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDLX and SMCWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDLXSMCWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.67

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.12

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.56

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.59

0.00

Drawdowns

MIDLX vs. SMCWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDLX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum SMCWX drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDLX and SMCWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDLXSMCWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-62.46%

+27.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.75%

-11.83%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-21.40%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.58%

-39.79%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

-39.79%

+5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-0.49%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-14.92%

+8.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

2.95%

+0.46%

Volatility

MIDLX vs. SMCWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) is 3.48%, while American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A (SMCWX) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that MIDLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMCWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDLXSMCWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

5.09%

-1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

12.83%

-3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

15.82%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

18.20%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.01%

17.90%

-3.89%

MIDLX vs. SMCWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCWX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDLX vs. SMCWX - Dividend Comparison

MIDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than SMCWX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
3.15%3.37%10.08%4.21%5.85%5.19%4.03%4.36%6.82%1.63%1.09%1.25%
SMCWX
American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund Class A
4.30%4.84%0.60%0.64%0.00%9.24%1.60%4.24%7.06%4.48%0.35%6.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDLX and SMCWX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMCWX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to MIDLX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDLX dropped -34.70% vs SMCWX's -62.46%.

SMCWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDLX and SMCWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer