MIDLX vs. DISMX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DISMX).
MIDLX is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World ex-US Small Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 1, 2012. DISMX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Dec 19, 2012.
Performance
MIDLX vs. DISMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIDLX vs. DISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | -4.04% | 17.03% | 3.33% | 13.21% | -18.52% | 5.17% | 10.15% | 24.97% | -10.29% | 30.65% |
DISMX DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio | -4.33% | 27.95% | 1.30% | 11.55% | -25.16% | 9.27% | 16.42% | 25.78% | -17.96% | 34.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDLX achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly higher than DISMX's -4.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MIDLX having a 6.07% annualized return and DISMX not far ahead at 6.31%.
MIDLX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -11.75%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 6M
- -4.78%
- 1Y
- 9.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.07%
DISMX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -12.22%
- YTD
- -4.33%
- 6M
- -3.35%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.85%
- 10Y*
- 6.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIDLX vs. DISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than DISMX's 0.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MIDLX vs. DISMX — Risk / Return Rank
MIDLX
DISMX
MIDLX vs. DISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDLX | DISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 1.12 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 1.55 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.22 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 1.35 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 5.36 | -2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDLX | DISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 1.12 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.11 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.39 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.45 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDLX and DISMX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIDLX vs. DISMX - Dividend Comparison
MIDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than DISMX's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | 3.51% | 3.37% | 10.08% | 4.21% | 5.85% | 5.19% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 6.82% | 1.63% | 1.09% | 1.25% |
DISMX DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 2.06% | 1.98% | 2.48% | 2.15% | 2.17% | 1.89% | 1.11% | 2.31% | 5.59% | 3.79% | 1.73% | 2.75% |
Drawdowns
MIDLX vs. DISMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDLX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum DISMX drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDLX and DISMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDLX | DISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -41.53% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -12.22% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.58% | -41.53% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.70% | -41.53% | +6.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.75% | -12.22% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -10.60% | +3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 3.07% | +0.01% |
Volatility
MIDLX vs. DISMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) is 5.06%, while DFA International Small Cap Growth Portfolio (DISMX) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that MIDLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIDLX | DISMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 6.07% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 10.27% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 15.61% | -3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.05% | 16.59% | -3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 16.28% | -2.36% |