MIDLX vs. WAIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX).
MIDLX is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World ex-US Small Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 1, 2012. WAIGX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Jun 27, 2002.
Performance
MIDLX vs. WAIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIDLX vs. WAIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | -1.87% | 17.03% | 3.33% | 13.21% | -18.52% | 5.17% | 10.15% | 24.97% | -10.29% | 30.65% |
WAIGX Wasatch International Growth Fund | -7.93% | 11.89% | -0.62% | 11.64% | -36.64% | 10.86% | 24.65% | 29.43% | -15.86% | 33.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDLX achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly higher than WAIGX's -7.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDLX has outperformed WAIGX with an annualized return of 6.30%, while WAIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.25% annualized return.
MIDLX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
WAIGX
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- YTD
- -7.93%
- 6M
- -10.56%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 2.52%
- 5Y*
- -4.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIDLX vs. WAIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than WAIGX's 1.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MIDLX vs. WAIGX — Risk / Return Rank
MIDLX
WAIGX
MIDLX vs. WAIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDLX | WAIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.26 | +0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 0.46 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.06 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.16 | +0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | 0.42 | +3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDLX | WAIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.26 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | -0.24 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.18 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.42 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDLX and WAIGX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIDLX vs. WAIGX - Dividend Comparison
MIDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than WAIGX's 58.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | 3.44% | 3.37% | 10.08% | 4.21% | 5.85% | 5.19% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 6.82% | 1.63% | 1.09% | 1.25% |
WAIGX Wasatch International Growth Fund | 58.41% | 53.78% | 20.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% | 10.93% | 2.50% | 17.84% | 2.71% | 4.01% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MIDLX vs. WAIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDLX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum WAIGX drawdown of -67.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDLX and WAIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDLX | WAIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -67.66% | +32.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -17.68% | +5.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.58% | -48.06% | +14.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.70% | -48.06% | +13.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.75% | -32.33% | +22.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -14.25% | +7.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 6.82% | -3.70% |
Volatility
MIDLX vs. WAIGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) is 5.67%, while Wasatch International Growth Fund (WAIGX) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that MIDLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIDLX | WAIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 6.67% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 10.24% | -1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 15.51% | -3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.09% | 18.63% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 18.10% | -4.17% |