MIDLX vs. GPMCX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX).
MIDLX is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World ex-US Small Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 1, 2012. GPMCX is managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. It was launched on Oct 19, 2015.
Performance
MIDLX vs. GPMCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIDLX vs. GPMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | -1.87% | 17.03% | 3.33% | 13.21% | -18.52% | 5.17% | 10.15% | 24.97% | -10.29% | 30.65% |
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund | -9.47% | 13.25% | 3.22% | 12.46% | -31.66% | 17.27% | 53.02% | 23.79% | -17.74% | 31.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDLX achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly higher than GPMCX's -9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDLX has underperformed GPMCX with an annualized return of 6.30%, while GPMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.95% annualized return.
MIDLX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
GPMCX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- -9.47%
- 6M
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIDLX vs. GPMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than GPMCX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MIDLX vs. GPMCX — Risk / Return Rank
MIDLX
GPMCX
MIDLX vs. GPMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDLX | GPMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.24 | +0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 0.42 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.05 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.19 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | 0.61 | +2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDLX | GPMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.24 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | -0.19 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.54 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.53 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDLX and GPMCX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIDLX vs. GPMCX - Dividend Comparison
MIDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than GPMCX's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDLX MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 | 3.44% | 3.37% | 10.08% | 4.21% | 5.85% | 5.19% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 6.82% | 1.63% | 1.09% | 1.25% |
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund | 3.68% | 3.33% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.76% | 8.25% | 0.69% | 6.99% | 7.34% | 1.20% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MIDLX vs. GPMCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDLX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum GPMCX drawdown of -44.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDLX and GPMCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDLX | GPMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.70% | -44.27% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -13.75% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.58% | -44.27% | +10.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.70% | -44.27% | +9.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.75% | -24.23% | +14.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -15.01% | +8.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 4.28% | -1.16% |
Volatility
MIDLX vs. GPMCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) is 5.67%, while Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that MIDLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIDLX | GPMCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 6.25% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.48% | 10.40% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 15.09% | -2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.09% | 15.02% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 14.79% | -0.86% |