GPMCX vs. WAMVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) and Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX).
GPMCX is managed by Grandeur Peak Funds. It was launched on Oct 19, 2015. WAMVX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Jul 28, 2003.
Performance
GPMCX vs. WAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GPMCX vs. WAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund | -9.47% | 13.25% | 3.22% | 12.46% | -31.66% | 17.27% | 53.02% | 23.79% | -17.74% | 31.50% |
WAMVX Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund | -2.68% | 9.31% | 24.40% | 13.13% | -28.95% | 26.17% | 41.10% | 29.93% | -8.88% | 26.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GPMCX achieves a -9.47% return, which is significantly lower than WAMVX's -2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, GPMCX has underperformed WAMVX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while WAMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.55% annualized return.
GPMCX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- -9.47%
- 6M
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
WAMVX
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 12.90%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GPMCX vs. WAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GPMCX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMVX's 1.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GPMCX vs. WAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
GPMCX
WAMVX
GPMCX vs. WAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) and Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GPMCX | WAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 0.87 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 1.35 | -0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 1.37 | -1.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | 4.51 | -3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GPMCX | WAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 0.87 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.13 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.62 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between GPMCX and WAMVX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GPMCX vs. WAMVX - Dividend Comparison
GPMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than WAMVX's 11.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPMCX Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund | 3.68% | 3.33% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 15.76% | 8.25% | 0.69% | 6.99% | 7.34% | 1.20% | 0.00% |
WAMVX Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund | 11.51% | 11.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 22.38% | 13.06% | 9.03% | 13.59% | 7.98% | 1.67% | 12.13% |
Drawdowns
GPMCX vs. WAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GPMCX drawdown since its inception was -44.27%, smaller than the maximum WAMVX drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GPMCX and WAMVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GPMCX | WAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.27% | -60.71% | +16.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -13.33% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.27% | -38.69% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.27% | -41.30% | -2.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.23% | -11.11% | -13.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.01% | -10.29% | -4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 4.05% | +0.23% |
Volatility
GPMCX vs. WAMVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grandeur Peak Global Micro Cap Fund (GPMCX) is 6.25%, while Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that GPMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GPMCX | WAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.25% | 7.18% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.40% | 13.94% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 21.17% | -6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 20.48% | -5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 21.21% | -6.42% |