PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDLX vs. FSTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDLX vs. FSTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDLX achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than FSTSX's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MIDLX has underperformed FSTSX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while FSTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.90% annualized return.


MIDLX

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.95%
6M
7.96%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
6.86%

FSTSX

1D
0.47%
1M
2.77%
YTD
7.71%
6M
10.35%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDLX vs. FSTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
6.95%17.03%3.33%13.21%-18.52%5.17%10.15%24.97%-10.29%30.65%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
7.71%27.49%4.97%18.36%-26.25%18.29%19.61%28.24%-13.19%34.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDLX and FSTSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2012

0.91

The correlation between MIDLX and FSTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDLX vs. FSTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDLX
MIDLX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MIDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDLX vs. FSTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDLXFSTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.59

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.17

5.37

-2.21

MIDLX vs. FSTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the FSTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDLX and FSTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDLXFSTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.28

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.39

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.62

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.62

-0.03

Drawdowns

MIDLX vs. FSTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDLX drawdown since its inception was -34.70%, smaller than the maximum FSTSX drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDLX and FSTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDLXFSTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.70%

-38.91%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.75%

-11.22%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-14.47%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.58%

-38.91%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

-38.91%

+4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-1.08%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-7.89%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.30%

+0.11%

Volatility

MIDLX vs. FSTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) is 3.48%, while Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that MIDLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDLXFSTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

4.43%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

11.06%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

13.93%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

16.42%

-3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.01%

15.94%

-1.93%

MIDLX vs. FSTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDLX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTSX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDLX vs. FSTSX - Dividend Comparison

MIDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than FSTSX's 14.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.15%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
3.15%3.37%10.08%4.21%5.85%5.19%4.03%4.36%6.82%1.63%1.09%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, MIDLX and FSTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSTSX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to MIDLX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDLX dropped -34.70% vs FSTSX's -38.91%.

FSTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDLX and FSTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer