PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTSX vs. BISAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTSX vs. BISAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTSX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than BISAX's 7.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTSX has underperformed BISAX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while BISAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.


FSTSX

1D
1.98%
1M
-0.05%
6M
3.14%
YTD
6.54%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
9.96%
ALL TIME*
9.53%

BISAX

1D
1.47%
1M
7.60%
6M
3.33%
YTD
7.90%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FSTSX vs. BISAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
6.54%27.49%4.97%18.36%-26.25%18.29%19.61%28.24%-13.19%34.44%
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
7.90%45.50%23.18%39.03%-8.68%18.39%4.62%6.80%-20.13%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTSX and BISAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2012

0.79

The correlation between FSTSX and BISAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTSX vs. BISAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BISAX
BISAX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BISAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BISAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSTSX vs. BISAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTSXBISAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.20

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.20

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

2.77

+0.80

FSTSX vs. BISAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the BISAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTSX and BISAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTSX vs. BISAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTSX drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, smaller than the maximum BISAX drawdown of -47.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTSX and BISAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTSXBISAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-47.30%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-11.63%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.48%

-11.63%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.91%

-31.44%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

-47.30%

+8.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-1.00%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-8.04%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

5.03%

-1.54%

Volatility

FSTSX vs. BISAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) at 3.44%. This indicates that FSTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BISAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTSXBISAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

3.44%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

10.76%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

12.86%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

13.89%

+2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

14.13%

+1.56%

FSTSX vs. BISAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BISAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTSX vs. BISAX - Dividend Comparison

FSTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.30%, more than BISAX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
3.41%3.23%3.06%2.81%3.87%3.46%0.81%0.66%3.88%8.33%4.00%3.44%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.30%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTSX and BISAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTSX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to BISAX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTSX dropped -38.91% vs BISAX's -47.30%.

BISAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTSX and BISAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer