PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDE vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDE vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 23.73% return.


MIDE

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.36%
YTD
14.45%
6M
14.97%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*

XMMO

1D
0.62%
1M
6.87%
YTD
23.73%
6M
25.73%
1Y
36.97%
3Y*
32.10%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDE vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
14.45%9.81%11.21%15.20%-11.63%11.77%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
23.73%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDE and XMMO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021

0.90

The correlation between MIDE and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

MIDE vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDE
XMMO

Industrials

23.3%
41.1%

Financial Services

16.8%
2.4%

Technology

13.9%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
4.6%

Healthcare

9.9%
6.3%

Real Estate

8.8%
6.1%

Energy

5.7%
7.7%

Basic Materials

3.7%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
0.5%

Utilities

1.7%
5.8%

Communication Services

0.9%
1.6%

Industrials

MIDE
23.3%
XMMO
41.1%

Financial Services

MIDE
16.8%
XMMO
2.4%

Technology

MIDE
13.9%
XMMO
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDE
12.1%
XMMO
4.6%

Healthcare

MIDE
9.9%
XMMO
6.3%

Real Estate

MIDE
8.8%
XMMO
6.1%

Energy

MIDE
5.7%
XMMO
7.7%

Basic Materials

MIDE
3.7%
XMMO
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

MIDE
3.2%
XMMO
0.5%

Utilities

MIDE
1.7%
XMMO
5.8%

Communication Services

MIDE
0.9%
XMMO
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDE vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDE
MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDE vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDEXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

4.45

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

18.21

-7.37

MIDE vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDE and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDEXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.99

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.78

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.58

-0.11

Drawdowns

MIDE vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDEXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.59%

-55.37%

+30.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.34%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

-24.93%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.59%

-27.91%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-9.45%

+2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.04%

+0.58%

Volatility

MIDE vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) is 4.59%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that MIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDEXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

7.82%

-3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

15.54%

-4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

18.71%

-2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

21.45%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

22.27%

-2.60%

MIDE vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIDE vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than XMMO's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
1.31%1.52%1.45%1.36%1.33%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.60%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDE and XMMO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to MIDE (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 5-year performance, XMMO leads with 16.69% vs 8.31% for MIDE. On fees, MIDE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MIDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 16.69% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MIDE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

MIDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.

MIDE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDE and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer