MIDE vs. VFMV
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV).
MIDE and VFMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MIDE is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2021. VFMV is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Performance
MIDE vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIDE vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.75% | 9.81% | 11.21% | 15.20% | -11.63% | 11.77% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.55% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 17.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 2.55% return.
MIDE
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIDE vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MIDE vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
MIDE
VFMV
MIDE vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDE | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 0.60 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 0.90 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.87 | +0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 4.02 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDE | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.60 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.79 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.65 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDE and VFMV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIDE vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than VFMV's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.48% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
MIDE vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and VFMV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDE | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -33.64% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -9.63% | -4.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.59% | -15.41% | -9.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.73% | -4.59% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -3.69% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 2.07% | +1.41% |
Volatility
MIDE vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 3.44%. This indicates that MIDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIDE | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 3.44% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | 6.62% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 12.31% | +8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 11.77% | +7.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 14.35% | +5.45% |