MIDE vs. VFMO
MIDE (Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MIDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard. MIDE is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIDE returned 8.31%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for VFMO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MIDE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.
Performance
MIDE vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 23.68% return.
MIDE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 43.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
MIDE vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 14.45% | 9.81% | 11.21% | 15.20% | -11.63% | 11.77% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.68% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDE and VFMO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MIDE and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
MIDE vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIDE
VFMO
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MIDE
VFMO
Financial Services
MIDE
VFMO
Technology
MIDE
VFMO
Consumer Cyclical
MIDE
VFMO
Healthcare
MIDE
VFMO
Real Estate
MIDE
VFMO
Energy
MIDE
VFMO
Basic Materials
MIDE
VFMO
Consumer Defensive
MIDE
VFMO
Utilities
MIDE
VFMO
Communication Services
MIDE
VFMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDE vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
MIDE
VFMO
MIDE vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDE | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.96 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 14.97 | -4.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDE | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.05 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.64 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.66 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MIDE vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum VFMO drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDE | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -36.77% | +12.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -10.98% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.59% | -24.40% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.59% | -25.80% | +1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -7.77% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.90% | -0.28% |
Volatility
MIDE vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) is 4.59%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that MIDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDE | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 6.20% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 16.37% | -4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 21.20% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 21.70% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 23.57% | -3.90% |
MIDE vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MIDE vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, more than VFMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.31% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDE and VFMO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMO has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to MIDE (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs VFMO's -36.77%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 13.84% vs 8.31% for MIDE. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, MIDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MIDE.
MIDE has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.63% for VFMO.
MIDE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.13% for VFMO.
VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIDE and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer