MIDE vs. HDEF
MIDE (Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF) and HDEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MIDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while HDEF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MIDE returned 8.31%/yr vs 9.83%/yr for HDEF. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MIDE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for HDEF.
Performance
MIDE vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly higher than HDEF's 3.99% return.
MIDE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 14.97%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
HDEF
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 15.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
MIDE vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 14.45% | 9.81% | 11.21% | 15.20% | -11.63% | 11.77% |
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 3.99% | 33.01% | 2.85% | 18.53% | -2.51% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between MIDE and HDEF is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between MIDE and HDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MIDE vs. HDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MIDE
HDEF
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MIDE
HDEF
Financial Services
MIDE
HDEF
Technology
MIDE
HDEF
Consumer Cyclical
MIDE
HDEF
Healthcare
MIDE
HDEF
Real Estate
MIDE
HDEF
Energy
MIDE
HDEF
Basic Materials
MIDE
HDEF
Consumer Defensive
MIDE
HDEF
Utilities
MIDE
HDEF
Communication Services
MIDE
HDEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MIDE vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank
MIDE
HDEF
MIDE vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIDE | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 1.99 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 6.16 | +4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIDE | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.37 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.70 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.45 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
MIDE vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum HDEF drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and HDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIDE | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.59% | -36.43% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.03% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.59% | -11.15% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.59% | -23.63% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -5.69% | +5.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -5.04% | -1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.59% | +0.03% |
Volatility
MIDE vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) at 3.75%. This indicates that MIDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MIDE | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 3.75% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 9.20% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 11.67% | +4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 14.14% | +5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 16.24% | +3.43% |
MIDE vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MIDE vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison
MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than HDEF's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 3.65% | 3.88% | 4.53% | 4.38% | 5.41% | 4.76% | 3.93% | 4.20% | 3.55% | 3.38% | 9.53% | 1.87% |
MIDE Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF | 1.31% | 1.52% | 1.45% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MIDE and HDEF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MIDE has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to HDEF (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs HDEF's -36.43%.
On 5-year performance, HDEF leads with 9.83% vs 8.31% for MIDE. On fees, MIDE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDEF has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MIDE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HDEF.
HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.31% for MIDE.
MIDE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while HDEF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.20% for HDEF.
MIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MIDE and HDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer