PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIDE vs. HDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIDE vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIDE achieves a 14.45% return, which is significantly higher than HDEF's 3.99% return.


MIDE

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.36%
YTD
14.45%
6M
14.97%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*

HDEF

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
3.99%
6M
6.18%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIDE vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
14.45%9.81%11.21%15.20%-11.63%11.77%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.99%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MIDE and HDEF is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021

0.63

The correlation between MIDE and HDEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MIDE vs. HDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MIDE
HDEF

Industrials

23.3%
8.8%

Financial Services

16.8%
26.9%

Technology

13.9%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
3.9%

Healthcare

9.9%
14.0%

Real Estate

8.8%
0.9%

Energy

5.7%
13.8%

Basic Materials

3.7%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
17.9%

Utilities

1.7%
8.4%

Communication Services

0.9%
4.0%

Industrials

MIDE
23.3%
HDEF
8.8%

Financial Services

MIDE
16.8%
HDEF
26.9%

Technology

MIDE
13.9%
HDEF
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

MIDE
12.1%
HDEF
3.9%

Healthcare

MIDE
9.9%
HDEF
14.0%

Real Estate

MIDE
8.8%
HDEF
0.9%

Energy

MIDE
5.7%
HDEF
13.8%

Basic Materials

MIDE
3.7%
HDEF
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

MIDE
3.2%
HDEF
17.9%

Utilities

MIDE
1.7%
HDEF
8.4%

Communication Services

MIDE
0.9%
HDEF
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIDE vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIDE
MIDE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MIDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIDE vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MIDEHDEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

1.99

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

6.16

+4.68

MIDE vs. HDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the HDEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIDE and HDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MIDEHDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.37

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.70

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.45

+0.02

Drawdowns

MIDE vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIDE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, smaller than the maximum HDEF drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIDE and HDEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIDEHDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.59%

-36.43%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.03%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

-11.15%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.59%

-23.63%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-5.69%

+5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-5.04%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.59%

+0.03%

Volatility

MIDE vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF (MIDE) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) at 3.75%. This indicates that MIDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIDEHDEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

3.75%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

9.20%

+2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

11.67%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

14.14%

+5.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

16.24%

+3.43%

MIDE vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIDE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MIDE vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison

MIDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than HDEF's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.65%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%
MIDE
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 ESG ETF
1.31%1.52%1.45%1.36%1.33%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIDE and HDEF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIDE has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to HDEF (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIDE dropped -24.59% vs HDEF's -36.43%.

On 5-year performance, HDEF leads with 9.83% vs 8.31% for MIDE. On fees, MIDE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HDEF has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MIDE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HDEF.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.31% for MIDE.

MIDE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while HDEF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. MIDE tracks S&P MidCap 400 ESG Index, while HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MIDE and 0.20% for HDEF.

MIDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIDE and HDEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer