PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MHY vs. MANI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MHY vs. MANI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Man Active High Yield ETF (MHY) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MHY achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly lower than MANI's 3.71% return.


MHY

1D
0.01%
1M
0.39%
YTD
2.83%
6M
3.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MANI

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.71%
6M
4.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MHY vs. MANI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MHY
Man Active High Yield ETF
2.83%1.74%
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
3.71%2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MHY and MANI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MHY vs. MANI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Man Active High Yield ETF (MHY) and Man Active Income ETF (MANI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MHY vs. MANI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MHYMANIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

4.24

-2.02

Drawdowns

MHY vs. MANI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MHY drawdown since its inception was -1.58%, which is greater than MANI's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHY and MANI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MHYMANIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-0.74%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.09%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-0.11%

-0.20%

Volatility

MHY vs. MANI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MHYMANIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96%

2.07%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

2.07%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.96%

2.07%

+0.89%

MHY vs. MANI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MHY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than MANI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MHY vs. MANI - Dividend Comparison

MHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than MANI's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM2025
MANI
Man Active Income ETF
3.18%3.00%
MHY
Man Active High Yield ETF
3.60%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


MHY and MANI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MHY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MHY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MANI.

MHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 3.18% for MANI.

MHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MANI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MHY and 0.85% for MANI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MHY and MANI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer