MHK vs. ISCG
MHK (Mohawk Industries, Inc.) is a stock, while ISCG (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF) is Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Over the past 10 years, MHK returned -5.61%/yr vs 11.26%/yr for ISCG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MHK vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MHK achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than ISCG's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, MHK has underperformed ISCG with an annualized return of -5.61%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.26% annualized return.
MHK
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- -7.37%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- -2.27%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.18%
- 10Y*
- -5.61%
ISCG
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 27.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
MHK vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MHK Mohawk Industries, Inc. | 0.61% | -8.25% | 15.10% | 1.25% | -43.89% | 29.25% | 3.35% | 16.60% | -57.61% | 38.17% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 15.38% | 12.88% | 13.35% | 23.13% | -26.75% | -1.26% | 43.41% | 27.66% | -6.91% | 24.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between MHK and ISCG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2004 | 0.60 |
The correlation between MHK and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MHK vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank
MHK
ISCG
MHK vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MHK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.24 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 2.31 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 8.76 | -8.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MHK vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MHK drawdown since its inception was -83.44%, which is greater than ISCG's maximum drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MHK and ISCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MHK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.44% | -57.72% | -25.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.50% | -11.43% | -21.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.02% | -26.71% | -15.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.51% | -37.80% | -25.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.40% | -41.48% | -37.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.39% | -2.65% | -58.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.09% | -11.58% | -19.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.46% | 3.02% | +15.44% |
Volatility
MHK vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 5.33%. This indicates that MHK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MHK | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.48% | 5.33% | +11.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.75% | 13.53% | +17.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.55% | 18.60% | +20.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.70% | 23.02% | +16.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.33% | 23.13% | +18.20% |
Dividends
MHK vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
MHK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.58% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
MHK Mohawk Industries, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MHK and ISCG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MHK has higher volatility (16.48%) compared to ISCG (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MHK dropped -83.44% vs ISCG's -57.72%.
ISCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MHK and ISCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer