PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGTIX vs. FISCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGTIX vs. FISCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MGTIX) and Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGTIX achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than FISCX's 11.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MGTIX has outperformed FISCX with an annualized return of 14.88%, while FISCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.37% annualized return.


MGTIX

1D
-0.62%
1M
3.17%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
0.26%
1Y
9.98%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
14.88%

FISCX

1D
0.92%
1M
5.98%
YTD
11.36%
6M
11.31%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGTIX vs. FISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGTIX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
-0.23%10.23%27.38%24.40%-18.99%26.41%22.84%40.17%1.07%28.97%
FISCX
Franklin Convertible Securities Fund
11.36%13.63%16.62%9.96%-15.95%-5.70%46.28%33.99%4.15%17.98%

Correlation

The correlation between MGTIX and FISCX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.83

The correlation between MGTIX and FISCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGTIX vs. FISCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGTIX
MGTIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MGTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MGTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FISCX
FISCX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGTIX vs. FISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MGTIX) and Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGTIXFISCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.44

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

4.03

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

16.49

-13.85

MGTIX vs. FISCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGTIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the FISCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGTIX and FISCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGTIXFISCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

2.46

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.39

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.92

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.81

-0.32

Drawdowns

MGTIX vs. FISCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGTIX drawdown since its inception was -60.05%, which is greater than FISCX's maximum drawdown of -49.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGTIX and FISCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGTIXFISCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.05%

-49.16%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.71%

-6.38%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.65%

-12.95%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.52%

-34.37%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

-34.37%

+1.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

0.00%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-6.91%

-10.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

1.56%

+2.52%

Volatility

MGTIX vs. FISCX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MGTIX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) at 2.88%. This indicates that MGTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGTIXFISCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

2.88%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

8.47%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.65%

10.45%

+2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.51%

12.40%

+5.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

13.48%

+4.73%

MGTIX vs. FISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGTIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FISCX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGTIX vs. FISCX - Dividend Comparison

MGTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.10%, more than FISCX's 8.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISCX
Franklin Convertible Securities Fund
8.89%9.94%4.87%2.22%8.70%8.10%11.30%16.05%7.09%7.68%4.62%4.68%
MGTIX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
11.10%11.08%16.84%4.17%4.59%10.30%7.43%7.38%10.72%6.83%5.00%6.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGTIX and FISCX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGTIX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to FISCX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGTIX dropped -60.05% vs FISCX's -49.16%.

FISCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGTIX and FISCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer