MGTIX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MGTIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
MGTIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 1, 1932. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
MGTIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGTIX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGTIX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | -9.29% | 10.23% | 27.38% | 24.40% | -18.99% | 26.41% | 22.84% | 40.17% | 1.07% | 28.97% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MGTIX having a -9.29% return and SCHG slightly lower at -9.73%. Over the past 10 years, MGTIX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 13.92%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
MGTIX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGTIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGTIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGTIX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
MGTIX
SCHG
MGTIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MGTIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGTIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 0.76 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.56 | 1.24 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.17 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.09 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 3.71 | -2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGTIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 0.76 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.79 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGTIX and SCHG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGTIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
MGTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.21%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGTIX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | 12.21% | 11.08% | 16.84% | 4.17% | 4.59% | 10.30% | 7.43% | 7.38% | 10.72% | 6.83% | 5.00% | 6.61% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
MGTIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGTIX drawdown since its inception was -60.05%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGTIX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGTIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.05% | -34.59% | -25.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.71% | -16.41% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.52% | -34.59% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.42% | -34.59% | +2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.18% | -12.51% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.20% | -5.22% | -11.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 4.84% | -1.02% |
Volatility
MGTIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MGTIX) is 5.48%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that MGTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGTIX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 6.77% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 12.54% | -2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.85% | 22.45% | -4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 22.31% | -4.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 21.51% | -3.33% |