PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGSEX vs. MATFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGSEX vs. MATFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGSEX achieves a 53.02% return, which is significantly lower than MATFX's 64.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MGSEX has outperformed MATFX with an annualized return of 18.01%, while MATFX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.31% annualized return.


MGSEX

1D
2.27%
1M
13.64%
YTD
53.02%
6M
57.41%
1Y
96.80%
3Y*
30.97%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
18.01%

MATFX

1D
0.32%
1M
19.01%
YTD
64.99%
6M
67.27%
1Y
101.60%
3Y*
35.72%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
16.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGSEX vs. MATFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGSEX
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund
53.02%41.56%7.23%-4.82%-27.91%0.83%38.74%80.58%-3.77%20.26%
MATFX
Matthews Asia Innovators Fund
64.99%30.22%16.47%-1.77%-24.66%-5.90%86.75%29.60%-18.59%52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MGSEX and MATFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 1999

0.62

Over the past year, MGSEX and MATFX have become more correlated (0.83) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGSEX vs. MATFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGSEX
MGSEX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MGSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MGSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MATFX
MATFX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MATFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MATFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGSEX vs. MATFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) and Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGSEXMATFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.19

4.82

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.63

5.62

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.82

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.84

8.78

-1.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.15

24.89

-1.74

MGSEX vs. MATFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGSEX Sharpe Ratio is 4.19, which is comparable to the MATFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGSEX and MATFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGSEXMATFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19

4.82

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.45

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.73

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.33

+0.19

Drawdowns

MGSEX vs. MATFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGSEX drawdown since its inception was -62.06%, smaller than the maximum MATFX drawdown of -76.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGSEX and MATFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGSEXMATFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.06%

-76.88%

+14.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.34%

-11.33%

-3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-18.19%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.13%

-45.33%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.32%

-52.42%

+7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-28.18%

+14.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

3.99%

+0.25%

Volatility

MGSEX vs. MATFX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund (MGSEX) has a higher volatility of 11.11% compared to Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) at 10.41%. This indicates that MGSEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MATFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGSEXMATFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.11%

10.41%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.66%

19.38%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.12%

22.66%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

24.50%

-4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.96%

22.64%

+3.32%

MGSEX vs. MATFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MGSEX and MATFX have an expense ratio of 1.18%.


Dividends

MGSEX vs. MATFX - Dividend Comparison

MGSEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while MATFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MATFX
Matthews Asia Innovators Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.54%31.07%1.67%0.29%2.63%8.44%0.00%15.24%
MGSEX
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific Fund
0.09%0.14%0.47%0.11%0.00%83.77%4.35%59.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGSEX and MATFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGSEX has higher volatility (11.11%) compared to MATFX (10.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGSEX dropped -62.06% vs MATFX's -76.88%.

MATFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.82 vs 4.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGSEX and MATFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer