MGPIX vs. ULPIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MGPIX (ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund) and ULPIX (ProFunds UltraBull Fund) are both mutual funds - MGPIX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while ULPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, MGPIX returned 7.80%/yr vs 23.21%/yr for ULPIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGPIX charges 1.69%/yr vs 1.46%/yr for ULPIX.

Performance

MGPIX vs. ULPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGPIX achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than ULPIX's 16.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MGPIX has underperformed ULPIX with an annualized return of 7.80%, while ULPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.21% annualized return.

MGPIX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 19.55%
• 6M: 16.93%
• 1Y: 29.59%
• 3Y*: 16.38%
• 5Y*: 2.35%
• 10Y*: 7.80%

ULPIX

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: -0.52%
• YTD: 16.02%
• 6M: 13.77%
• 1Y: 45.84%
• 3Y*: 32.87%
• 5Y*: 17.45%
• 10Y*: 23.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGPIX vs. ULPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund	19.55%	5.56%	13.77%	15.40%	-20.47%	-6.46%	20.28%	24.09%	-12.06%	18.08%
ULPIX ProFunds UltraBull Fund	16.02%	25.47%	38.03%	45.59%	-39.16%	59.28%	19.12%	62.17%	-15.02%	42.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MGPIX and ULPIX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001	0.89

The correlation between MGPIX and ULPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MGPIX vs. ULPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGPIX

MGPIX Risk / Return Rank: 52
MGPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
MGPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MGPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MGPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MGPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ULPIX

ULPIX Risk / Return Rank: 51
ULPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ULPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
ULPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ULPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ULPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGPIX vs. ULPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MGPIX	ULPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.96	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.52	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	2.67	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.09	11.36	+0.72

MGPIX vs. ULPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the ULPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGPIX and ULPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MGPIX vs. ULPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGPIX drawdown since its inception was -54.61%, smaller than the maximum ULPIX drawdown of -89.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGPIX and ULPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MGPIX	ULPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.61%	-89.68%	+35.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-18.30%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.86%	-36.59%	+10.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.84%	-46.92%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.84%	-59.41%	+15.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.93%	+3.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.10%	-33.78%	+22.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	4.29%	-1.76%

Volatility

MGPIX vs. ULPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) is 5.55%, while ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) has a volatility of 9.35%. This indicates that MGPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ULPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MGPIX	ULPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	9.35%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.62%	19.65%	-6.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.36%	24.96%	-7.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.32%	34.09%	-11.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.29%	35.54%	-14.25%

MGPIX vs. ULPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGPIX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ULPIX's 1.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

MGPIX vs. ULPIX - Dividend Comparison

MGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than ULPIX's 7.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund	2.86%	3.42%	0.91%	0.00%	3.26%	1.47%	2.69%	0.00%	0.00%
ULPIX ProFunds UltraBull Fund	7.85%	9.11%	0.00%	0.02%	10.36%	5.62%	12.74%	0.42%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MGPIX and ULPIX in my portfolio?

MGPIX and ULPIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MGPIX or ULPIX?

ULPIX has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to MGPIX (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGPIX dropped -54.61% vs ULPIX's -89.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ULPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.