MGPIX vs. VFH

In the year-to-date period, MGPIX achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than VFH's 4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MGPIX has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 3.94%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

MGPIX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MGPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGPIX and VFH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MGPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.

The maximum MGPIX drawdown since its inception was -58.24%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGPIX and VFH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 3.51%. This indicates that MGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.