MGPIX vs. VFH
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH).
MGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001. VFH is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
MGPIX vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGPIX vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.10% | 5.56% | 13.77% | 15.40% | -20.47% | -6.46% | 20.28% | 24.09% | -12.06% | 18.08% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -9.21% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGPIX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -9.21% return. Over the past 10 years, MGPIX has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 5.90%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.29% annualized return.
MGPIX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 15.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
VFH
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -7.19%
- 1Y
- 2.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGPIX vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGPIX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGPIX vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
MGPIX
VFH
MGPIX vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGPIX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.13 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 0.32 | +0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.27 | +0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 0.79 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGPIX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.13 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.48 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.55 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.24 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGPIX and VFH is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGPIX vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
MGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than VFH's 1.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 3.42% | 3.42% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 3.26% | 1.47% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.61% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Drawdowns
MGPIX vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGPIX drawdown since its inception was -54.61%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGPIX and VFH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGPIX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.61% | -78.61% | +24.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -14.75% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.84% | -25.66% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.84% | -44.42% | +0.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.17% | -11.97% | -2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -18.62% | +7.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 4.93% | -1.77% |
Volatility
MGPIX vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.85%. This indicates that MGPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGPIX | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 4.85% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 11.76% | +0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 19.97% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 19.38% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 22.56% | -1.40% |