MGPIX vs. UGPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX).
MGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Sep 4, 2001. UGPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Feb 3, 2008.
Performance
MGPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.10% | 5.56% | 13.77% | 15.40% | -20.47% | -6.46% | 20.28% | 24.09% | -12.06% | 18.08% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -27.95% | 36.28% | -21.79% | -11.49% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGPIX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -27.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MGPIX has outperformed UGPIX with an annualized return of 5.90%, while UGPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -14.29% annualized return.
MGPIX
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 15.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
UGPIX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -18.68%
- YTD
- -27.95%
- 6M
- -48.28%
- 1Y
- -30.96%
- 3Y*
- -15.66%
- 5Y*
- -37.37%
- 10Y*
- -14.29%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGPIX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank
MGPIX
UGPIX
MGPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | -0.55 | +1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | -0.51 | +1.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.94 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | -0.69 | +1.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | -1.49 | +5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | -0.55 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | -0.10 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | -0.05 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | -0.05 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGPIX and UGPIX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MGPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison
MGPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than UGPIX's 8.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGPIX ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund | 3.42% | 3.42% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 3.26% | 1.47% | 2.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 8.39% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
Drawdowns
MGPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGPIX drawdown since its inception was -54.61%, smaller than the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGPIX and UGPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.61% | -99.66% | +45.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -51.12% | +37.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.84% | -98.52% | +54.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.84% | -99.10% | +55.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.17% | -97.95% | +83.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -82.60% | +71.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 23.70% | -20.54% |
Volatility
MGPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund (MGPIX) is 7.03%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 15.79%. This indicates that MGPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 15.79% | -8.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 36.85% | -24.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 57.63% | -35.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 390.11% | -367.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 277.87% | -256.71% |