PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGOYX vs. USBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MGOYX vs. USBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGOYX achieves a 18.00% return, which is significantly higher than USBLX's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, MGOYX has outperformed USBLX with an annualized return of 10.92%, while USBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.


MGOYX

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.58%
YTD
18.00%
6M
17.95%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
7.97%
10Y*
10.92%

USBLX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.81%
YTD
6.50%
6M
6.64%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
8.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGOYX vs. USBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGOYX
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund
18.00%12.03%10.93%14.82%-21.31%25.97%20.61%26.22%-14.19%24.55%
USBLX
USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund
6.50%10.30%13.32%16.10%-15.82%14.80%10.78%18.46%-1.95%13.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MGOYX and USBLX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 1998

0.85

The correlation between MGOYX and USBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGOYX vs. USBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGOYX
MGOYX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MGOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MGOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

USBLX
USBLX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
USBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
USBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
USBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
USBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGOYX vs. USBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGOYXUSBLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

2.89

-0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

4.16

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.55

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

3.43

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.69

16.86

-2.17

MGOYX vs. USBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGOYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the USBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGOYX and USBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGOYXUSBLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.89

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.80

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.91

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.82

-0.36

Drawdowns

MGOYX vs. USBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGOYX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than USBLX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGOYX and USBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGOYXUSBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.23%

-33.49%

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-5.24%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

-11.66%

-14.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-20.51%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.49%

-21.93%

-18.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

0.00%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-4.30%

-6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.07%

+0.95%

Volatility

MGOYX vs. USBLX - Volatility Comparison

Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund (MGOYX) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX) at 1.77%. This indicates that MGOYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGOYXUSBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

1.77%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

4.87%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

6.23%

+7.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.06%

8.65%

+16.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

9.09%

+14.17%

MGOYX vs. USBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MGOYX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than USBLX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

MGOYX vs. USBLX - Dividend Comparison

MGOYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.03%, more than USBLX's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGOYX
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund
13.03%15.37%15.72%4.54%12.23%25.13%18.63%60.72%49.01%19.34%12.76%10.52%
USBLX
USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund
2.01%1.96%2.28%2.11%1.74%1.66%1.88%1.95%2.73%2.16%2.31%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MGOYX and USBLX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGOYX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to USBLX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGOYX dropped -57.23% vs USBLX's -33.49%.

USBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGOYX and USBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer