MGNI vs. GS
MGNI (Magnite, Inc.) and GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) are both stocks. MGNI operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while GS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, MGNI returned 1.65%/yr vs 24.48%/yr for GS. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MGNI vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGNI achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than GS's 22.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MGNI has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 1.65%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 24.48% annualized return.
MGNI
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 26.76%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- -0.31%
- 1Y
- -4.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.24%
- 5Y*
- -13.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.65%
GS
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 22.08%
- 6M
- 20.84%
- 1Y
- 76.70%
- 3Y*
- 49.31%
- 5Y*
- 25.98%
- 10Y*
- 24.48%
MGNI vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGNI Magnite, Inc. | 0.12% | 1.95% | 70.45% | -11.80% | -39.49% | -43.02% | 276.35% | 118.77% | 99.47% | -74.80% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 22.08% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGNI and GS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2014 | 0.33 |
The correlation between MGNI and GS shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MGNI:
$2.41B
GS:
$327.33B
MGNI:
$1.05
GS:
$57.41
MGNI:
15.45
GS:
18.51
MGNI:
0.00
GS:
2.40
MGNI:
3.39
GS:
3.02
MGNI:
2.62
GS:
2.66
MGNI:
$722.55M
GS:
$110.77B
MGNI:
$458.33M
GS:
$61.53B
MGNI:
$150.13M
GS:
$24.94B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGNI vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
MGNI
GS
MGNI vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGNI | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.41 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 3.80 | -3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 12.61 | -12.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGNI vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGNI drawdown since its inception was -93.30%, which is greater than GS's maximum drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGNI and GS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGNI | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.30% | -78.84% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.77% | -19.42% | -38.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.95% | -30.90% | -27.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.35% | -32.84% | -51.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.65% | -48.75% | -41.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.71% | -2.73% | -70.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.84% | -22.65% | -42.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.47% | 5.84% | +32.63% |
Volatility
MGNI vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) has a higher volatility of 15.85% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 11.84%. This indicates that MGNI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGNI | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.85% | 11.84% | +4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.24% | 23.47% | +17.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.37% | 28.55% | +28.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.01% | 28.10% | +46.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.60% | 29.87% | +46.73% |
Dividends
MGNI vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
MGNI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
MGNI Magnite, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MGNI vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Magnite, Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MGNI vs. GS - Profitability Comparison
MGNI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magnite, Inc. reported a gross profit of 103.96M and revenue of 164.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.3%.
GS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.91B and revenue of 17.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.
MGNI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magnite, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.72M and revenue of 164.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
GS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.49B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.
MGNI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magnite, Inc. reported a net income of 4.41M and revenue of 164.37M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
GS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 5.63B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MGNI and GS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGNI has higher volatility (15.85%) compared to GS (11.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGNI dropped -93.30% vs GS's -78.84%.
GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGNI and GS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer