PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MGIC vs. ICE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MGIC vs. ICE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Magic Software Enterprises Ltd (MGIC) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MGIC achieves a -32.50% return, which is significantly lower than ICE's -11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MGIC has outperformed ICE with an annualized return of 13.19%, while ICE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.78% annualized return.


MGIC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-32.50%
6M
-29.83%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
13.19%

ICE

1D
-1.78%
1M
-7.99%
YTD
-11.81%
6M
-7.78%
1Y
-20.11%
3Y*
11.05%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MGIC vs. ICE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd
-32.50%123.97%29.28%-36.46%-21.27%37.01%63.06%32.73%-5.91%29.18%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
-11.81%9.92%17.46%27.12%-23.91%19.94%26.15%24.47%8.11%26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between MGIC and ICE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2005

0.18

The correlation between MGIC and ICE shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MGIC:

$853.34M

ICE:

$81.16B

EPS

MGIC:

$0.82

ICE:

$6.85

PE Ratio

MGIC:

21.31

ICE:

20.80

PEG Ratio

MGIC:

1.69

ICE:

2.51

PS Ratio

MGIC:

1.41

ICE:

6.23

PB Ratio

MGIC:

3.09

ICE:

2.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

MGIC:

$603.22M

ICE:

$13.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MGIC:

$169.17M

ICE:

$8.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

MGIC:

$86.68M

ICE:

$7.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MGIC vs. ICE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MGIC
MGIC Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
MGIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGIC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MGIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGIC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ICE
ICE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MGIC vs. ICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd (MGIC) and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MGICICEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.26

-0.94

+1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

-1.20

+1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.85

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

-0.84

+1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.57

-1.53

+2.10

MGIC vs. ICE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MGIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the ICE Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MGIC and ICE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MGICICEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

-0.94

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.30

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.53

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.42

-0.28

Drawdowns

MGIC vs. ICE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MGIC drawdown since its inception was -97.62%, which is greater than ICE's maximum drawdown of -73.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGIC and ICE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MGICICEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.62%

-73.94%

-23.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.32%

-23.76%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.55%

-23.76%

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.94%

-34.32%

-29.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.94%

-34.32%

-29.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.21%

-23.76%

-13.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.98%

-16.45%

-41.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.93%

13.00%

+7.93%

Volatility

MGIC vs. ICE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd (MGIC) is 0.00%, while Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that MGIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MGICICEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

5.09%

-5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.15%

18.09%

+18.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.42%

21.41%

+22.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.06%

20.98%

+17.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.27%

22.16%

+13.11%

Dividends

MGIC vs. ICE - Dividend Comparison

MGIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than ICE's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
1.38%1.19%1.21%1.31%1.48%0.97%1.04%1.19%1.27%1.13%1.21%1.13%
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd
2.57%3.01%3.66%6.47%3.16%2.12%1.63%3.13%3.74%2.57%2.62%3.18%

Financials

MGIC vs. ICE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Magic Software Enterprises Ltd and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
161.66M
3.67B
(MGIC) Total Revenue
(ICE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MGIC vs. ICE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Magic Software Enterprises Ltd and Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
27.4%
78.8%
Portfolio components
MGIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd reported a gross profit of 44.21M and revenue of 161.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

ICE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.89B and revenue of 3.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

MGIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd reported an operating income of 17.12M and revenue of 161.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

ICE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.4%.

MGIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd reported a net income of 9.86M and revenue of 161.66M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

ICE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. reported a net income of 1.41B and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in a net margin of 38.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MGIC and ICE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICE has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to MGIC (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGIC dropped -97.62% vs ICE's -73.94%.

MGIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MGIC and ICE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer