MGHYX vs. PRCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX).
MGHYX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Mar 16, 1998. PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014.
Performance
MGHYX vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGHYX vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund | -0.34% | 9.82% | 6.99% | 11.17% | -11.67% | 3.22% | 6.83% | 16.36% | -1.85% | 6.49% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 0.37% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 6.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGHYX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than PRCPX's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MGHYX has underperformed PRCPX with an annualized return of 5.07%, while PRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.88% annualized return.
MGHYX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.07%
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGHYX vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGHYX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGHYX vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank
MGHYX
PRCPX
MGHYX vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGHYX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | 3.49 | -1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 5.55 | -2.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.93 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 4.86 | -1.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.90 | 22.46 | -10.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGHYX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 3.49 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 1.24 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 1.27 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.88 | -0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGHYX and PRCPX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGHYX vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison
MGHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%, less than PRCPX's 12.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGHYX DWS Global High Income Fund | 7.33% | 7.17% | 5.58% | 4.35% | 5.81% | 4.20% | 5.81% | 5.63% | 6.96% | 3.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.83% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
Drawdowns
MGHYX vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGHYX drawdown since its inception was -53.47%, which is greater than PRCPX's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGHYX and PRCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGHYX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.47% | -23.07% | -30.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -3.03% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.93% | -14.34% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.84% | -23.07% | +1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.24% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.27% | -3.16% | -21.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 0.66% | +0.05% |
Volatility
MGHYX vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison
DWS Global High Income Fund (MGHYX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) at 1.24%. This indicates that MGHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGHYX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 1.24% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.34% | 2.48% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 4.12% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 4.79% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.90% | 5.45% | +0.45% |